Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTGS vs SPY
FTGS vs SPY Comparison
Open Charts FTGS vs SPY
First Trust Growth Strength ETF
Price$35.89
Change+$0.13 (+0.36%)
Volume$984
Net Assets1.28B
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
Price$664.36
Change+$3.72 (+0.56%)
Volume$367.1K
Net Assets669.71B
FTGS vs SPY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTGS vs. SPY commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTGS is a Hold and SPY is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SPY has more net assets: 670B vs. FTGS (1.28B). FTGS (14.066) and SPY (13.709) have matching annual dividend yield . FTGS was incepted earlier than SPY: FTGS (3 years) vs SPY (33 years). SPY (0.09) has a lower expense ratio than FTGS (0.60). FTGS has a higher turnover SPY (3.00) vs SPY (3.00).
| FTGS | SPY | FTGS / SPY | |
| Gain YTD | 14.066 | 13.709 | 103% |
| Net Assets | 1.28B | 670B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.09 | 635% |
| Turnover | 102.00 | 3.00 | 3,400% |
| Yield | 0.33 | 1.09 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 33 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FTGS | SPY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 16 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 69% | 8 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FTGS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTGS has been closely correlated with AXP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTGS jumps, then AXP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTGS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTGS | 100% | -0.85% | ||
| AXP - FTGS | 84% Closely correlated | -2.28% | ||
| CPAY - FTGS | 81% Closely correlated | -3.57% | ||
| BX - FTGS | 81% Closely correlated | -3.62% | ||
| APO - FTGS | 80% Closely correlated | -5.37% | ||
| AMP - FTGS | 78% Closely correlated | -2.81% | ||
More | ||||
SPY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPY has been loosely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SPY jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPY | 100% | -0.68% | ||
| MSFT - SPY | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.35% | ||
| AAPL - SPY | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.76% | ||
| AVGO - SPY | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.80% | ||
| AMZN - SPY | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.51% | ||
| META - SPY | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.76% | ||
More | ||||