Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTGRX vs RWMFX
FTGRX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts FTGRX vs RWMFX
Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock M
Price$28.77
Change-$0.19 (-0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.7B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.23
Change+$0.16 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.51B
FTGRX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTGRX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTGRX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 205B vs. FTGRX (4.7B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than FTGRX: RWMFX (1.43) vs FTGRX (0.42). FTGRX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: FTGRX (18 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). FTGRX (1.12) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. FTGRX (9.00). FTGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: FTGRX (0) vs RWMFX (250). FTGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.76 vs. RWMFX (7.95). FTGRX return over 5 years is better than : 109.03 vs. RWMFX (50.81).
| FTGRX | RWMFX | FTGRX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.31 | 361% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.31 | 361% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.277 | 8.213 | 174% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.7B | 205B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.42 | 1.43 | 29% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.76 | 7.95 | 274% |
| Returns for 3 years | 81.96 | 34.82 | 235% |
| Returns for 5 years | 109.03 | 50.81 | 215% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.18 | 83.34 | 118% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers