Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTGQX vs TEDSX
FTGQX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts FTGQX vs TEDSX
Templeton Growth C
Price$27.42
Change+$0.08 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.28B
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$31.46
Change+$0.07 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.51B
FTGQX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTGQX vs. TEDSX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTGQX is a StrongBuy and TEDSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX (9.51B) and FTGQX (9.28B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . TEDSX (0.74) and FTGQX (0.71) have matching dividends . FTGQX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: FTGQX (7 years) vs TEDSX (33 years). TEDSX (1.96) is less costly to investors than FTGQX (1.77). FTGQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.43 vs. TEDSX (34.55). FTGQX (1000) and TEDSX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TEDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.56 vs. FTGQX (6.11). FTGQX return over 5 years is better than : 22.63 vs. TEDSX (16.11).
| FTGQX | TEDSX | FTGQX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 1.96 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 1.96 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.868 | 12.077 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.28B | 9.51B | 98% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 0.74 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.11 | 11.56 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.90 | 19.92 | 165% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.63 | 16.11 | 140% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 12.94 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers