Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTGQX vs TEDSX
FTGQX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts FTGQX vs TEDSX
Templeton Growth C
Price$27.97
Change-$2.46 (-8.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.42B
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$32.38
Change-$0.11 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.71B
FTGQX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTGQX vs. TEDSX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTGQX is a Buy and TEDSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX (9.71B) and FTGQX (9.42B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . TEDSX pays higher dividends than FTGQX: TEDSX (0.79) vs FTGQX (0.00). FTGQX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: FTGQX (7 years) vs TEDSX (33 years). TEDSX (1.96) is less costly to investors than FTGQX (1.78). FTGQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.43 vs. TEDSX (34.55). FTGQX (1000) and TEDSX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TEDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.97 vs. FTGQX (7.21). FTGQX return over 5 years is better than : 22.47 vs. TEDSX (16.32).
| FTGQX | TEDSX | FTGQX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 1.96 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 1.96 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.605 | 3.450 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.42B | 9.71B | 97% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.79 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.21 | 11.97 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.58 | 15.51 | 158% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.47 | 16.32 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 29.34 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers