Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTGQX vs RWBEX
FTGQX vs RWBEX Comparison
Open Charts FTGQX vs RWBEX
Templeton Growth C
Price$29.57
Change+$0.03 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.13B
American Funds Capital World Gr&Inc R2E
Price$72.43
Change+$0.05 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets137.49B
FTGQX vs RWBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTGQX vs. RWBEX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTGQX is a StrongBuy and RWBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWBEX has more cash in the bank: 137B vs. FTGQX (9.13B). RWBEX pays higher dividends than FTGQX: RWBEX (1.06) vs FTGQX (0.75). FTGQX was incepted earlier than RWBEX: FTGQX (7 years) vs RWBEX (11 years). FTGQX (1.77) is less costly to investors than RWBEX (1.21). FTGQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.43 vs. RWBEX (27.00). RWBEX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTGQX: RWBEX (250) vs FTGQX (1000). FTGQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.75 vs. RWBEX (10.91). FTGQX return over 5 years is better than : 48.30 vs. RWBEX (45.19).
| FTGQX | RWBEX | FTGQX / RWBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 1.21 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 1.21 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.326 | 15.151 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.13B | 137B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 1.06 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.75 | 10.91 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.95 | 39.62 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.30 | 45.19 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 61.34 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers