Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTGFX vs TEDSX
FTGFX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts FTGFX vs TEDSX
Templeton Growth R6
Price$31.93
Change-$0.48 (-1.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.41B
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$32.44
Change-$0.36 (-1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.43B
FTGFX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTGFX vs. TEDSX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTGFX is a Buy and TEDSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX (9.43B) and FTGFX (9.41B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FTGFX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: FTGFX (0.97) vs TEDSX (0.75). FTGFX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: FTGFX (13 years) vs TEDSX (33 years). TEDSX (1.96) is less costly to investors than FTGFX (0.74). FTGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.43 vs. TEDSX (34.55). TEDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTGFX: TEDSX (1000) vs FTGFX (1000000). FTGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.51 vs. TEDSX (5.08). FTGFX return over 5 years is better than : 49.11 vs. TEDSX (27.14).
| FTGFX | TEDSX | FTGFX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.96 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.96 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.269 | 16.851 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.41B | 9.43B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 0.75 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.51 | 5.08 | 305% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.74 | 17.27 | 294% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.11 | 27.14 | 181% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.73 | 10.70 | 474% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement