FTGFF
Price
$8.57
Change
-$0.16 (-1.83%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
213.64M
MTUAF
Price
$424.50
Change
-$7.91 (-1.83%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
23.56B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FTGFF vs MTUAF

Header iconFTGFF vs MTUAF Comparison
Open Charts FTGFF vs MTUAFBanner chart's image
Firan Technology Group
Price$8.57
Change-$0.16 (-1.83%)
Volume$300
Capitalization213.64M
MTU Aero Engines AG
Price$424.50
Change-$7.91 (-1.83%)
Volume$229
Capitalization23.56B
FTGFF vs MTUAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FTGFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTUAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FTGFF vs. MTUAF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTGFF is a Hold and MTUAF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (FTGFF: $8.57 vs. MTUAF: $424.50)
Brand notoriety: FTGFF and MTUAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Aerospace & Defense industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FTGFF: 147% vs. MTUAF: 66%
Market capitalization -- FTGFF: $213.64M vs. MTUAF: $23.56B
FTGFF [@Aerospace & Defense] is valued at $213.64M. MTUAF’s [@Aerospace & Defense] market capitalization is $23.56B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Aerospace & Defense] industry ranges from $271.41B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Aerospace & Defense] industry is $20.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FTGFF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMTUAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FTGFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MTUAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FTGFF is a better buy in the long-term than MTUAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FTGFF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTUAF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FTGFF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MTUAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MTUAF is a better buy in the short-term than FTGFF.

Price Growth

FTGFF (@Aerospace & Defense) experienced а -0.72% price change this week, while MTUAF (@Aerospace & Defense) price change was -0.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Aerospace & Defense industry was +2.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +35.98%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Aerospace & Defense (+2.27% weekly)

Aerospace & Defense is one of largest industries in the U.S., mainly comprising the following areas: commercial airliners, military aircraft, missiles, space, and general aviation. Focused heavily on research & development, it is also one of the fastest growing industries. Military aircraft has the largest market share in the industry’s sales, followed by space systems, civil aircraft, and missiles. Aerospace exports, directly and indirectly, support more jobs than the export of any other commodity, according to a study by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Boeing Company, Lockheed Martin Corporation and General Electric Company are some of the most prominent players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTUAF($23.6B) has a higher market cap than FTGFF($214M). MTUAF has higher P/E ratio than FTGFF: MTUAF (31.51) vs FTGFF (21.76). FTGFF YTD gains are higher at: 68.618 vs. MTUAF (26.245).
FTGFFMTUAFFTGFF / MTUAF
Capitalization214M23.6B1%
EBITDA29.4MN/A-
Gain YTD68.61826.245261%
P/E Ratio21.7631.5169%
Revenue170MN/A-
Total Cash9.98MN/A-
Total Debt45MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FTGFF vs MTUAF: Fundamental Ratings
FTGFF
MTUAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
61
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
215
SMR RATING
1..100
5075
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3640
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1643
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FTGFF's Valuation (60) in the null industry is in the same range as MTUAF (61). This means that FTGFF’s stock grew similarly to MTUAF’s over the last 12 months.

FTGFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as MTUAF (15). This means that FTGFF’s stock grew similarly to MTUAF’s over the last 12 months.

FTGFF's SMR Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as MTUAF (75). This means that FTGFF’s stock grew similarly to MTUAF’s over the last 12 months.

FTGFF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as MTUAF (40). This means that FTGFF’s stock grew similarly to MTUAF’s over the last 12 months.

FTGFF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is in the same range as MTUAF (43). This means that FTGFF’s stock grew similarly to MTUAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FTGFFMTUAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FTGFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTUAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MXHTX10.170.10
+0.99%
Empower International Growth Instl
MITTX37.690.21
+0.56%
MFS Massachusetts Investors Tr A
TEMVX8.980.04
+0.45%
Nuveen Emerging Markets Eq W
DCLVX18.740.08
+0.43%
Dunham Large Cap Value C
RYECX181.98-1.14
-0.62%
Rydex Energy C

FTGFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FTGFF and SATL have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FTGFF and SATL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTGFF
1D Price
Change %
FTGFF100%
-1.83%
SATL - FTGFF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AVAV - FTGFF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NRPI - FTGFF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MIESY - FTGFF
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTUAF - FTGFF
-4%
Poorly correlated
-1.83%
More

MTUAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTUAF has been loosely correlated with MTUAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MTUAF jumps, then MTUAY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTUAF
1D Price
Change %
MTUAF100%
-1.83%
MTUAY - MTUAF
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.39%
BAESF - MTUAF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.73%
SAFRF - MTUAF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.03%
OBTEF - MTUAF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HWKE - MTUAF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More