Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTEC vs SPAM
FTEC vs SPAM Comparison
Open Charts FTEC vs SPAM
Fidelity MSCI Information Tech ETF
Price$225.16
Change-$2.90 (-1.27%)
Volume$800
Net Assets16.94B
Themes Cybersecurity ETF
Price$31.57
Change-$0.04 (-0.13%)
Volume$237
Net Assets2.53M
FTEC vs SPAM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTEC vs. SPAM commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTEC is a Hold and SPAM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTEC has more net assets: 16.9B vs. SPAM (2.53M). SPAM has a higher annual dividend yield than FTEC: SPAM (3.163) vs FTEC (1.504). FTEC was incepted earlier than SPAM: FTEC (12 years) vs SPAM (2 years). FTEC (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than SPAM (0.35). SPAM has a higher turnover FTEC (9.00) vs FTEC (9.00).
| FTEC | SPAM | FTEC / SPAM | |
| Gain YTD | 1.504 | 3.163 | 48% |
| Net Assets | 16.9B | 2.53M | 668,777% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 0.35 | 24% |
| Turnover | 9.00 | 38.00 | 24% |
| Yield | 0.43 | 0.07 | 646% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FTEC | SPAM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 24 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 82% | 13 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MBBB | 21.74 | 0.06 | +0.29% |
| VanEck Mdy's Aly BBB Corp Bd ETF | |||
| PZA | 23.34 | 0.02 | +0.09% |
| Invesco National AMT-Free Muni Bd ETF | |||
| EVLU | 33.44 | N/A | N/A |
| iShares MSCI Emerging Mkts Val Fac ETF | |||
| ACSI | 68.02 | -0.36 | -0.53% |
| American Customer Satisfaction ETF | |||
| XSW | 187.52 | -3.19 | -1.67% |
| State StreetSPDRS&PSftwr&SvcsETF | |||
FTEC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTEC has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTEC jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTEC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTEC | 100% | -0.08% | ||
| NVDA - FTEC | 85% Closely correlated | +0.47% | ||
| MKSI - FTEC | 80% Closely correlated | +3.96% | ||
| AEIS - FTEC | 79% Closely correlated | +2.78% | ||
| KLAC - FTEC | 79% Closely correlated | +0.96% | ||
| LRCX - FTEC | 79% Closely correlated | -2.73% | ||
More | ||||
SPAM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SPAM and BAH have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SPAM and BAH's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPAM | 100% | -1.33% | ||
| BAH - SPAM | 10% Poorly correlated | -1.51% | ||
| RDWR - SPAM | 10% Poorly correlated | -1.03% | ||
| FSLY - SPAM | 9% Poorly correlated | -0.75% | ||
| OKTA - SPAM | 7% Poorly correlated | +0.53% | ||
| QLYS - SPAM | 6% Poorly correlated | -1.53% | ||
More | ||||