| FTEC | SPAM | FTEC / SPAM | |
| Gain YTD | 24.068 | 7.067 | 341% |
| Net Assets | 16.9B | 2.51M | 674,381% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 0.35 | 24% |
| Turnover | 9.00 | 38.00 | 24% |
| Yield | 0.40 | 0.12 | 345% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 2 years | - |
| FTEC | SPAM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 82% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 79% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DFVX | 75.22 | 0.29 | +0.39% |
| Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF | |||
| XSEP | 42.48 | 0.06 | +0.14% |
| FT Vest U.S. Eq Enh & ModBufETF-Sep | |||
| ERET | 26.60 | N/A | N/A |
| iShares Environmentally Aware Rl Est ETF | |||
| USCA | 41.58 | N/A | N/A |
| Xtrackers MSCI USA Clmt Actn Eq ETF | |||
| GMUB | 51.15 | -0.01 | -0.01% |
| Goldman Sachs Municipal Income ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTEC has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTEC jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTEC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTEC | 100% | +0.18% | ||
| NVDA - FTEC | 85% Closely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| MKSI - FTEC | 80% Closely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| AEIS - FTEC | 79% Closely correlated | -0.13% | ||
| KLAC - FTEC | 79% Closely correlated | +0.65% | ||
| LRCX - FTEC | 79% Closely correlated | +1.24% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor tells us that SPAM and BAH have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SPAM and BAH's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPAM | 100% | N/A | ||
| BAH - SPAM | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.59% | ||
| RDWR - SPAM | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.04% | ||
| FSLY - SPAM | 9% Poorly correlated | +1.05% | ||
| OKTA - SPAM | 7% Poorly correlated | -0.75% | ||
| QLYS - SPAM | 6% Poorly correlated | +0.33% | ||
More | ||||