Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTEC vs SPAM
FTEC vs SPAM Comparison
Open Charts FTEC vs SPAM
Fidelity MSCI Information Tech ETF
Price$226.92
Change+$0.42 (+0.19%)
Volume$216.13K
Net Assets16.84B
Themes Cybersecurity ETF
Price$32.15
Change-$0.24 (-0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.61M
FTEC vs SPAM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTEC vs. SPAM commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTEC is a Hold and SPAM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTEC has more net assets: 16.8B vs. SPAM (2.61M). FTEC has a higher annual dividend yield than SPAM: FTEC (22.944) vs SPAM (10.294). FTEC was incepted earlier than SPAM: FTEC (12 years) vs SPAM (2 years). FTEC (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than SPAM (0.35). SPAM has a higher turnover FTEC (9.00) vs FTEC (9.00).
| FTEC | SPAM | FTEC / SPAM | |
| Gain YTD | 22.944 | 10.294 | 223% |
| Net Assets | 16.8B | 2.61M | 643,678% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 0.35 | 24% |
| Turnover | 9.00 | 24.00 | 38% |
| Yield | 0.40 | 0.12 | 345% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FTEC | SPAM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 87% | 7 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 83% | 7 days ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 83% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 89% | 7 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 83% | 7 days ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 89% | 10 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 82% | 15 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 87% | 7 days ago 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FTEC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTEC has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTEC jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTEC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTEC | 100% | +0.99% | ||
| NVDA - FTEC | 85% Closely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| MKSI - FTEC | 80% Closely correlated | +3.27% | ||
| AEIS - FTEC | 79% Closely correlated | +1.54% | ||
| KLAC - FTEC | 79% Closely correlated | +2.82% | ||
| LRCX - FTEC | 79% Closely correlated | +2.21% | ||
More | ||||
SPAM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SPAM and BAH have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SPAM and BAH's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPAM | 100% | +0.37% | ||
| BAH - SPAM | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.96% | ||
| RDWR - SPAM | 10% Poorly correlated | +2.34% | ||
| FSLY - SPAM | 9% Poorly correlated | -0.94% | ||
| OKTA - SPAM | 7% Poorly correlated | +1.66% | ||
| QLYS - SPAM | 6% Poorly correlated | +1.87% | ||
More | ||||