Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTDZX vs SHSAX
FTDZX vs SHSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTDZX vs. SHSAX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTDZX is a Buy and SHSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHSAX has more cash in the bank: 6.31B vs. FTDZX (732M). SHSAX pays higher dividends than FTDZX: SHSAX (0.22) vs FTDZX (0.00). FTDZX was incepted earlier than SHSAX: FTDZX (16 years) vs SHSAX (26 years). SHSAX (1.09) is less costly to investors than FTDZX (0.81). SHSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. FTDZX (21.87). SHSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTDZX: SHSAX (1000) vs FTDZX (100000). FTDZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -14.80 vs. SHSAX (-16.26). SHSAX return over 5 years is better than : -15.72 vs. FTDZX (-25.04).
| FTDZX | SHSAX | FTDZX / SHSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.09 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.09 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.601 | -6.182 | -74% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 732M | 6.31B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.22 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.80 | -16.26 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.82 | -6.90 | -360% |
| Returns for 5 years | -25.04 | -15.72 | 159% |
| Returns for 10 years | -35.82 | 1.74 | -2,061% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement