Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTDWX vs MXIPX
FTDWX vs MXIPX Comparison
Open Charts FTDWX vs MXIPX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 20% M
Price$13.92
Change-$0.02 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.49B
Empower Conservative Profile L
Price$9.56
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.44B
FTDWX vs MXIPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTDWX vs. MXIPX commentary
Aug 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTDWX is a Buy and MXIPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTDWX has more cash in the bank: 5.49B vs. MXIPX (1.44B). FTDWX pays higher dividends than MXIPX: FTDWX (2.70) vs MXIPX (2.02). FTDWX was incepted earlier than MXIPX: FTDWX (19 years) vs MXIPX (14 years). MXIPX (1.10) is less costly to investors than FTDWX (1.02). MXIPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. FTDWX (24.00). FTDWX (0) and MXIPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTDWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.60 vs. MXIPX (3.53). MXIPX (10.08) and FTDWX (10.05) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FTDWX | MXIPX | FTDWX / MXIPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.02 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.10 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.509 | 4.026 | 112% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.49B | 1.44B | 382% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.70 | 2.02 | 134% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.60 | 3.53 | 159% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.71 | 8.89 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.05 | 10.08 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.09 | 17.46 | 127% |