Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTDS vs MDY
FTDS vs MDY Comparison
Open Charts FTDS vs MDY
First Trust Dividend Strength ETF
Price$54.80
Change-$0.13 (-0.24%)
Volume$2.1K
Net Assets27.39M
SPDR® S&P MIDCAP 400 ETF Trust
Price$580.05
Change-$2.99 (-0.51%)
Volume$613K
Net Assets23.02B
FTDS vs MDY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTDS vs. MDY commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTDS is a Hold and MDY is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDY has more net assets: 23B vs. FTDS (27.4M). FTDS has a higher annual dividend yield than MDY: FTDS (9.562) vs MDY (2.946). FTDS was incepted earlier than MDY: FTDS (19 years) vs MDY (30 years). MDY (0.24) has a lower expense ratio than FTDS (0.70). FTDS has a higher turnover MDY (20.43) vs MDY (20.43).
| FTDS | MDY | FTDS / MDY | |
| Gain YTD | 9.562 | 2.946 | 325% |
| Net Assets | 27.4M | 23B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.24 | 292% |
| Turnover | 104.00 | 20.43 | 509% |
| Yield | 1.88 | 1.19 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 30 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FTDS | MDY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 6 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 78% | 6 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FTDS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTDS has been closely correlated with RF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTDS jumps, then RF could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTDS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTDS | 100% | -0.31% | ||
| RF - FTDS | 76% Closely correlated | +0.81% | ||
| SSB - FTDS | 76% Closely correlated | -0.13% | ||
| MTB - FTDS | 74% Closely correlated | +0.38% | ||
| OZK - FTDS | 72% Closely correlated | -0.69% | ||
| EWBC - FTDS | 71% Closely correlated | +0.36% | ||
More | ||||
MDY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDY has been closely correlated with AVNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MDY jumps, then AVNT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDY | 100% | -1.34% | ||
| AVNT - MDY | 80% Closely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| FHN - MDY | 76% Closely correlated | +0.45% | ||
| CG - MDY | 72% Closely correlated | -0.79% | ||
| GGG - MDY | 72% Closely correlated | -2.55% | ||
| IBOC - MDY | 72% Closely correlated | -0.80% | ||
More | ||||