Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTDS vs MDY
FTDS vs MDY Comparison
Open Charts FTDS vs MDY
First Trust Dividend Strength ETF
Price$59.36
Change-$0.22 (-0.37%)
Volume$100
Net Assets29.61M
SPDR® S&P MIDCAP 400 ETF Trust
Price$639.79
Change-$1.99 (-0.31%)
Volume$4.38K
Net Assets25.01B
FTDS vs MDY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTDS vs. MDY commentary
Jan 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTDS is a Hold and MDY is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDY has more net assets: 25B vs. FTDS (29.6M). MDY has a higher annual dividend yield than FTDS: MDY (6.382) vs FTDS (5.463). FTDS was incepted earlier than MDY: FTDS (19 years) vs MDY (31 years). MDY (0.24) has a lower expense ratio than FTDS (0.70). FTDS has a higher turnover MDY (15.77) vs MDY (15.77).
| FTDS | MDY | FTDS / MDY | |
| Gain YTD | 5.463 | 6.382 | 86% |
| Net Assets | 29.6M | 25B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.24 | 292% |
| Turnover | 104.00 | 15.77 | 659% |
| Yield | 1.60 | 1.15 | 139% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 31 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FTDS | MDY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 17 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FTDS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTDS has been closely correlated with SNV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTDS jumps, then SNV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTDS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTDS | 100% | +0.43% | ||
| SNV - FTDS | 78% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| CE - FTDS | 76% Closely correlated | +0.38% | ||
| CMA - FTDS | 75% Closely correlated | +1.05% | ||
| PFG - FTDS | 75% Closely correlated | -0.25% | ||
| CBSH - FTDS | 75% Closely correlated | +0.79% | ||
More | ||||
MDY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDY has been closely correlated with EVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MDY jumps, then EVR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y