FTDR
Price
$62.15
Change
+$0.24 (+0.39%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
4.53B
56 days until earnings call
NCLH
Price
$25.34
Change
+$0.62 (+2.51%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
11.45B
55 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FTDR vs NCLH

Header iconFTDR vs NCLH Comparison
Open Charts FTDR vs NCLHBanner chart's image
Frontdoor
Price$62.15
Change+$0.24 (+0.39%)
Volume$906.13K
Capitalization4.53B
Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings
Price$25.34
Change+$0.62 (+2.51%)
Volume$16.68M
Capitalization11.45B
FTDR vs NCLH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FTDR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NCLH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FTDR vs. NCLH commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTDR is a StrongBuy and NCLH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (FTDR: $61.91 vs. NCLH: $24.72)
Brand notoriety: FTDR and NCLH are both not notable
FTDR represents the Personnel Services, while NCLH is part of the Consumer Sundries industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FTDR: 115% vs. NCLH: 91%
Market capitalization -- FTDR: $4.53B vs. NCLH: $11.45B
FTDR [@Personnel Services] is valued at $4.53B. NCLH’s [@Consumer Sundries] market capitalization is $11.45B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Personnel Services] industry ranges from $27.29B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Consumer Sundries] industry ranges from $180.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Personnel Services] industry is $2.77B. The average market capitalization across the [@Consumer Sundries] industry is $18.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FTDR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNCLH’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FTDR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NCLH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FTDR is a better buy in the long-term than NCLH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FTDR’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NCLH’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FTDR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • NCLH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FTDR is a better buy in the short-term than NCLH.

Price Growth

FTDR (@Personnel Services) experienced а +1.73% price change this week, while NCLH (@Consumer Sundries) price change was -0.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Personnel Services industry was -3.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.43%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was +3.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

FTDR is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

NCLH is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Personnel Services (-3.21% weekly)

Personnel Services comprise companies that provide staffing and human resources management solutions for businesses. Each company might be involved in one or more types of recruitment or employee solutions such as permanent or temporary staffing, career consulting, outsourcing, administrative services and many more. Some personnel services companies cater to large businesses, while some specialize in providing services to small/medium-sized organizations. These specialized services potentially expedite the process of getting the ‘right’ candidates and/or training them to meet the requirements of a business process. Some of the companies also cover other critical areas like internal auditing for a company. Robert Half International Inc., ManpowerGroup Inc. and Insperity, Inc. are examples of companies in the personnel services industry.

@Consumer Sundries (+3.35% weekly)

Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NCLH($11.5B) has a higher market cap than FTDR($4.53B). FTDR has higher P/E ratio than NCLH: FTDR (18.44) vs NCLH (17.36). FTDR YTD gains are higher at: 13.243 vs. NCLH (-3.925). NCLH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.38B vs. FTDR (458M). FTDR has more cash in the bank: 562M vs. NCLH (184M). FTDR has less debt than NCLH: FTDR (1.21B) vs NCLH (13.8B). NCLH has higher revenues than FTDR: NCLH (9.56B) vs FTDR (1.97B).
FTDRNCLHFTDR / NCLH
Capitalization4.53B11.5B39%
EBITDA458M2.38B19%
Gain YTD13.243-3.925-337%
P/E Ratio18.4417.36106%
Revenue1.97B9.56B21%
Total Cash562M184M305%
Total Debt1.21B13.8B9%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FTDR vs NCLH: Fundamental Ratings
FTDR
NCLH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1160
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6566
SMR RATING
1..100
1317
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
458
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4858
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NCLH's Valuation (83) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as FTDR (99) in the Homebuilding industry. This means that NCLH’s stock grew similarly to FTDR’s over the last 12 months.

FTDR's Profit vs Risk Rating (65) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as NCLH (66) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry. This means that FTDR’s stock grew similarly to NCLH’s over the last 12 months.

FTDR's SMR Rating (13) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as NCLH (17) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry. This means that FTDR’s stock grew similarly to NCLH’s over the last 12 months.

NCLH's Price Growth Rating (8) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FTDR (45) in the Homebuilding industry. This means that NCLH’s stock grew somewhat faster than FTDR’s over the last 12 months.

FTDR's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as NCLH (58) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry. This means that FTDR’s stock grew similarly to NCLH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FTDRNCLH
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FTDR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NCLH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FNKFX16.87N/A
N/A
Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock K6
GABPX50.51-0.21
-0.41%
Goldman Sachs Equity Income P
LMNVX131.20-0.88
-0.67%
ClearBridge Value I
RAFFX46.81-0.36
-0.76%
American Funds AMCAP R5
DASVX15.18-0.12
-0.78%
Dunham Small Cap Value A

FTDR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTDR has been loosely correlated with TNL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FTDR jumps, then TNL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTDR
1D Price
Change %
FTDR100%
+1.91%
TNL - FTDR
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.33%
NCLH - FTDR
33%
Loosely correlated
-0.48%
CCL - FTDR
32%
Poorly correlated
-2.29%
RCL - FTDR
31%
Poorly correlated
-2.52%
BKNG - FTDR
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.67%
More

NCLH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NCLH has been closely correlated with CCL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NCLH jumps, then CCL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NCLH
1D Price
Change %
NCLH100%
-0.48%
CCL - NCLH
88%
Closely correlated
-2.29%
CUK - NCLH
87%
Closely correlated
-2.41%
RCL - NCLH
79%
Closely correlated
-2.52%
VIK - NCLH
71%
Closely correlated
-1.82%
TNL - NCLH
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.33%
More