FTDR
Price
$66.76
Change
+$0.26 (+0.39%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
4.86B
34 days until earnings call
MED
Price
$13.65
Change
-$0.18 (-1.30%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
150.03M
45 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FTDR vs MED

Header iconFTDR vs MED Comparison
Open Charts FTDR vs MEDBanner chart's image
Frontdoor
Price$66.76
Change+$0.26 (+0.39%)
Volume$363.58K
Capitalization4.86B
Medifast
Price$13.65
Change-$0.18 (-1.30%)
Volume$134.08K
Capitalization150.03M
FTDR vs MED Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FTDR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MED
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FTDR vs. MED commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTDR is a StrongBuy and MED is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (FTDR: $66.76 vs. MED: $13.63)
Brand notoriety: FTDR and MED are both not notable
Both companies represent the Personnel Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FTDR: 15% vs. MED: 25%
Market capitalization -- FTDR: $4.86B vs. MED: $150.03M
FTDR [@Personnel Services] is valued at $4.86B. MED’s [@Personnel Services] market capitalization is $150.03M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Personnel Services] industry ranges from $27.35B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Personnel Services] industry is $2.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FTDR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMED’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FTDR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MED’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FTDR is a better buy in the long-term than MED.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FTDR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MED’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FTDR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MED’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FTDR and MED are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FTDR (@Personnel Services) experienced а -0.48% price change this week, while MED (@Personnel Services) price change was -6.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Personnel Services industry was -2.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.80%.

Reported Earning Dates

FTDR is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

MED is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Personnel Services (-2.02% weekly)

Personnel Services comprise companies that provide staffing and human resources management solutions for businesses. Each company might be involved in one or more types of recruitment or employee solutions such as permanent or temporary staffing, career consulting, outsourcing, administrative services and many more. Some personnel services companies cater to large businesses, while some specialize in providing services to small/medium-sized organizations. These specialized services potentially expedite the process of getting the ‘right’ candidates and/or training them to meet the requirements of a business process. Some of the companies also cover other critical areas like internal auditing for a company. Robert Half International Inc., ManpowerGroup Inc. and Insperity, Inc. are examples of companies in the personnel services industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTDR($4.86B) has a higher market cap than MED($150M). MED has higher P/E ratio than FTDR: MED (41.36) vs FTDR (19.81). FTDR YTD gains are higher at: 22.115 vs. MED (-22.645). FTDR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 458M vs. MED (14.2M). FTDR has more cash in the bank: 562M vs. MED (163M). MED has less debt than FTDR: MED (13.1M) vs FTDR (1.21B). FTDR has higher revenues than MED: FTDR (1.97B) vs MED (480M).
FTDRMEDFTDR / MED
Capitalization4.86B150M3,242%
EBITDA458M14.2M3,225%
Gain YTD22.115-22.645-98%
P/E Ratio19.8141.3648%
Revenue1.97B480M410%
Total Cash562M163M345%
Total Debt1.21B13.1M9,198%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FTDR vs MED: Fundamental Ratings
FTDR
MED
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
784
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
2
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
59100
SMR RATING
1..100
1391
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4060
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
393
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MED's Valuation (2) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for FTDR (96) in the Homebuilding industry. This means that MED’s stock grew significantly faster than FTDR’s over the last 12 months.

FTDR's Profit vs Risk Rating (59) in the Homebuilding industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MED (100) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that FTDR’s stock grew somewhat faster than MED’s over the last 12 months.

FTDR's SMR Rating (13) in the Homebuilding industry is significantly better than the same rating for MED (91) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that FTDR’s stock grew significantly faster than MED’s over the last 12 months.

FTDR's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as MED (60) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that FTDR’s stock grew similarly to MED’s over the last 12 months.

MED's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FTDR (39) in the Homebuilding industry. This means that MED’s stock grew somewhat faster than FTDR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FTDRMED
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FTDR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MED
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CEUFX63.09N/A
N/A
American Funds EUPAC 529-F-1
AAAPX12.54N/A
N/A
DWS RREEF Real Assets C
MFWIX17.84N/A
N/A
MFS Global Total Return I
MNHCX26.51N/A
N/A
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term L
MLOAX9.36N/A
N/A
Cohen & Steers Future of Energy A

FTDR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTDR has been loosely correlated with TNL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FTDR jumps, then TNL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTDR
1D Price
Change %
FTDR100%
+0.39%
TNL - FTDR
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.23%
NCLH - FTDR
33%
Loosely correlated
-0.89%
CCL - FTDR
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.41%
RCL - FTDR
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.76%
BKNG - FTDR
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.97%
More

MED and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MED and FTDR have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MED and FTDR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MED
1D Price
Change %
MED100%
-1.45%
FTDR - MED
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.39%
TNL - MED
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.23%
MCW - MED
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
SCI - MED
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.28%
LIND - MED
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.00%
More