Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTDHX vs MBXIX
FTDHX vs MBXIX Comparison
Open Charts FTDHX vs MBXIX
American Funds College 2039 529-F-3
Price$12.65
Change-$0.07 (-0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.63B
Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy I
Price$39.72
Change+$0.02 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.34B
FTDHX vs MBXIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBXIX has more cash in the bank: 8.34B vs. FTDHX (1.63B). MBXIX pays higher dividends than FTDHX: MBXIX (1.85) vs FTDHX (1.41). FTDHX was incepted earlier than MBXIX: FTDHX (4 years) vs MBXIX (10 years). MBXIX (2.03) is less costly to investors than FTDHX (0.44). MBXIX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTDHX: MBXIX (2500) vs FTDHX (1000000). FTDHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.29 vs. MBXIX (0.56).
| FTDHX | MBXIX | FTDHX / MBXIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 2.03 | 22% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 2.03 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.705 | 2.267 | 472% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.63B | 8.34B | 20% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 1.85 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.29 | 0.56 | 2,374% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.66 | 13.35 | 402% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 60.80 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement