Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTCWX vs TSIPX
FTCWX vs TSIPX Comparison
Open Charts FTCWX vs TSIPX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 20% C
Price$13.80
Change-$0.05 (-0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.51B
Nuveen Lifestyle Income Premier
Price$11.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.87M
FTCWX vs TSIPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTCWX vs. TSIPX commentary
Jul 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTCWX is a Buy and TSIPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTCWX has more cash in the bank: 5.51B vs. TSIPX (75.9M). TSIPX pays higher dividends than FTCWX: TSIPX (3.82) vs FTCWX (2.24). FTCWX was incepted earlier than TSIPX: FTCWX (19 years) vs TSIPX (14 years). FTCWX (1.52) is less costly to investors than TSIPX (0.88). FTCWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. TSIPX (19.00). FTCWX (0) and TSIPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TSIPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.12 vs. FTCWX (6.00). TSIPX return over 5 years is better than : 11.57 vs. FTCWX (8.83).
| FTCWX | TSIPX | FTCWX / TSIPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.59 | 258% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.88 | 173% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.172 | 4.563 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.51B | 75.9M | 7,256% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.24 | 3.82 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.00 | 7.12 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.98 | 18.25 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.83 | 11.57 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.11 | 29.32 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement