Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTCWX vs JQLCX
FTCWX vs JQLCX Comparison
Open Charts FTCWX vs JQLCX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 20% C
Price$13.84
Change+$0.04 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.51B
JHancock Multimanager Lifestyle Cnsrv R2
Price$12.08
Change+$0.03 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.59B
FTCWX vs JQLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTCWX vs. JQLCX commentary
Jul 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTCWX is a Buy and JQLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTCWX has more cash in the bank: 5.51B vs. JQLCX (1.59B). JQLCX pays higher dividends than FTCWX: JQLCX (3.63) vs FTCWX (2.24). FTCWX was incepted earlier than JQLCX: FTCWX (19 years) vs JQLCX (13 years). FTCWX (1.52) is less costly to investors than JQLCX (1.32). FTCWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. JQLCX (16.00). FTCWX (0) and JQLCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. JQLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.20 vs. FTCWX (5.31). JQLCX return over 5 years is better than : 9.31 vs. FTCWX (8.02).
| FTCWX | JQLCX | FTCWX / JQLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 1.32 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 1.32 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.796 | 4.596 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.51B | 1.59B | 347% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.24 | 3.63 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.31 | 7.20 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.75 | 16.42 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.02 | 9.31 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.87 | 21.01 | 76% |