Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTCOX vs RGWBX
FTCOX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts FTCOX vs RGWBX
Franklin Corefolio Allocation A
Price$25.08
Change+$0.05 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.04B
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2
Price$29.38
Change+$0.08 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.9B
FTCOX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTCOX vs. RGWBX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTCOX is a Hold and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 24.9B vs. FTCOX (1.04B). FTCOX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: FTCOX (0.66) vs RGWBX (0.00). FTCOX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: FTCOX (22 years) vs RGWBX (14 years). RGWBX (1.46) is less costly to investors than FTCOX (1.01). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTCOX: RGWBX (250) vs FTCOX (1000). RGWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.58 vs. FTCOX (5.09). RGWBX return over 5 years is better than : 30.92 vs. FTCOX (14.61).
| FTCOX | RGWBX | FTCOX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.46 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.46 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.448 | 20.707 | 41% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 24.9B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.09 | 11.58 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.56 | 57.08 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.61 | 30.92 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.59 | 95.38 | 51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement