Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTCOX vs RGWBX
FTCOX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts FTCOX vs RGWBX
Franklin Corefolio Allocation A
Price$24.94
Change-$0.15 (-0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.05B
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2
Price$28.28
Change+$0.09 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.13B
FTCOX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTCOX vs. RGWBX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTCOX is a Hold and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 25.1B vs. FTCOX (1.05B). FTCOX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: FTCOX (0.43) vs RGWBX (0.00). FTCOX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: FTCOX (22 years) vs RGWBX (14 years). RGWBX (1.46) is less costly to investors than FTCOX (1.01). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTCOX: RGWBX (250) vs FTCOX (1000). RGWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.10 vs. FTCOX (8.36). RGWBX return over 5 years is better than : 22.99 vs. FTCOX (16.39).
| FTCOX | RGWBX | FTCOX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.46 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.46 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.754 | 2.286 | 77% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.05B | 25.1B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.36 | 16.10 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.04 | 56.66 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.39 | 22.99 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.16 | 116.53 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement