FTBYF
Price
$0.48
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
5.73M
PLG
Price
$1.48
Change
-$0.14 (-8.64%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
118.83M
11 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FTBYF vs PLG

Header iconFTBYF vs PLG Comparison
Open Charts FTBYF vs PLGBanner chart's image
Fortune Bay
Price$0.48
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$350
Capitalization5.73M
Platinum Group Metals
Price$1.48
Change-$0.14 (-8.64%)
Volume$1.45M
Capitalization118.83M
FTBYF vs PLG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FTBYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PLG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FTBYF vs. PLG commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTBYF is a Hold and PLG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (FTBYF: $0.48 vs. PLG: $1.48)
Brand notoriety: FTBYF and PLG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FTBYF: 1% vs. PLG: 121%
Market capitalization -- FTBYF: $5.73M vs. PLG: $118.83M
FTBYF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $5.73M. PLG’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $118.83M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FTBYF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePLG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FTBYF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PLG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FTBYF is a better buy in the long-term than PLG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FTBYF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PLG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FTBYF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PLG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PLG is a better buy in the short-term than FTBYF.

Price Growth

FTBYF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -10.83% price change this week, while PLG (@Precious Metals) price change was +7.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

PLG is expected to report earnings on Jul 10, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PLG($119M) has a higher market cap than FTBYF($5.73M). FTBYF YTD gains are higher at: 213.198 vs. PLG (15.625). FTBYF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.45M vs. PLG (-5.09M). PLG has more cash in the bank: 7.11M vs. FTBYF (94.5K). FTBYF has less debt than PLG: FTBYF (156K) vs PLG (302K). FTBYF (0) and PLG (0) have equivalent revenues.
FTBYFPLGFTBYF / PLG
Capitalization5.73M119M5%
EBITDA-1.45M-5.09M29%
Gain YTD213.19815.6251,364%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash94.5K7.11M1%
Total Debt156K302K52%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FTBYF vs PLG: Fundamental Ratings
FTBYF
PLG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5032
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9294
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3549
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10078
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FTBYF's Valuation (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PLG (96) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that FTBYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PLG’s over the last 12 months.

FTBYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PLG (100) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that FTBYF’s stock grew similarly to PLG’s over the last 12 months.

FTBYF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as PLG (94) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that FTBYF’s stock grew similarly to PLG’s over the last 12 months.

FTBYF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as PLG (49) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that FTBYF’s stock grew similarly to PLG’s over the last 12 months.

PLG's P/E Growth Rating (78) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as FTBYF (100) in the null industry. This means that PLG’s stock grew similarly to FTBYF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FTBYFPLG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FTBYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PLG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CLMB103.332.89
+2.88%
Climb Global Solutions
VOYA70.680.43
+0.61%
Voya Financial
MSFT497.45N/A
N/A
Microsoft Corp
EFSC55.73-0.05
-0.09%
Enterprise Financial Services Corp
HOUR1.35-0.08
-5.59%
Hour Loop

FTBYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FTBYF and PLG have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FTBYF and PLG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTBYF
1D Price
Change %
FTBYF100%
-1.44%
PLG - FTBYF
20%
Poorly correlated
-8.64%
GFIOF - FTBYF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GFKRF - FTBYF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GGLXF - FTBYF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GBBFF - FTBYF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PLG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLG has been loosely correlated with SBSW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PLG jumps, then SBSW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLG
1D Price
Change %
PLG100%
-8.64%
SBSW - PLG
55%
Loosely correlated
-7.15%
MUX - PLG
54%
Loosely correlated
-3.81%
NEWP - PLG
52%
Loosely correlated
-2.94%
MAG - PLG
52%
Loosely correlated
-3.76%
MTA - PLG
52%
Loosely correlated
-3.05%
More