FTBYF
Price
$0.48
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
5.73M
GGXXF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.63M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FTBYF vs GGXXF

Header iconFTBYF vs GGXXF Comparison
Open Charts FTBYF vs GGXXFBanner chart's image
Fortune Bay
Price$0.48
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$350
Capitalization5.73M
GGX Gold
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$6.28K
Capitalization1.63M
FTBYF vs GGXXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FTBYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GGXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FTBYF vs. GGXXF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTBYF is a Hold and GGXXF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (FTBYF: $0.48 vs. GGXXF: $0.02)
Brand notoriety: FTBYF and GGXXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FTBYF: 1% vs. GGXXF: 293%
Market capitalization -- FTBYF: $5.73M vs. GGXXF: $1.63M
FTBYF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $5.73M. GGXXF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $1.63M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FTBYF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGGXXF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FTBYF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GGXXF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GGXXF is a better buy in the long-term than FTBYF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FTBYF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GGXXF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FTBYF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GGXXF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FTBYF is a better buy in the short-term than GGXXF.

Price Growth

FTBYF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -10.83% price change this week, while GGXXF (@Precious Metals) price change was +18.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTBYF($5.73M) has a higher market cap than GGXXF($1.63M). FTBYF YTD gains are higher at: 213.198 vs. GGXXF (94.545). GGXXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -554.32K vs. FTBYF (-1.45M). FTBYF has more cash in the bank: 94.5K vs. GGXXF (664). FTBYF has less debt than GGXXF: FTBYF (156K) vs GGXXF (579K). FTBYF (0) and GGXXF (0) have equivalent revenues.
FTBYFGGXXFFTBYF / GGXXF
Capitalization5.73M1.63M351%
EBITDA-1.45M-554.32K262%
Gain YTD213.19894.545225%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash94.5K66414,232%
Total Debt156K579K27%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FTBYF vs GGXXF: Fundamental Ratings
FTBYF
GGXXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
92100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3539
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10016
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GGXXF's Valuation (19) in the null industry is in the same range as FTBYF (38). This means that GGXXF’s stock grew similarly to FTBYF’s over the last 12 months.

GGXXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FTBYF (100). This means that GGXXF’s stock grew similarly to FTBYF’s over the last 12 months.

FTBYF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as GGXXF (100). This means that FTBYF’s stock grew similarly to GGXXF’s over the last 12 months.

FTBYF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as GGXXF (39). This means that FTBYF’s stock grew similarly to GGXXF’s over the last 12 months.

GGXXF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FTBYF (100). This means that GGXXF’s stock grew significantly faster than FTBYF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FTBYFGGXXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FTBYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GGXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NRC16.670.60
+3.73%
National Research Corp
AMP528.072.59
+0.49%
Ameriprise Financial
RUSHA50.99N/A
N/A
Rush Enterprises
KVAC11.37-0.02
-0.18%
Keen Vision Acquisition Corp
BFRG1.51-0.06
-3.82%
Bullfrog AI Holdings

FTBYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FTBYF and PLG have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FTBYF and PLG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTBYF
1D Price
Change %
FTBYF100%
-1.44%
PLG - FTBYF
20%
Poorly correlated
-8.64%
GFIOF - FTBYF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GFKRF - FTBYF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GGLXF - FTBYF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GBBFF - FTBYF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GGXXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GGXXF and FPVTF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GGXXF and FPVTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GGXXF
1D Price
Change %
GGXXF100%
N/A
FPVTF - GGXXF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NMEX - GGXXF
20%
Poorly correlated
+32.49%
GFGSF - GGXXF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.16%
FTBYF - GGXXF
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.44%
GAYMF - GGXXF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.54%
More