FTBYF
Price
$0.55
Change
-$0.06 (-9.84%)
Updated
Sep 2 closing price
Capitalization
33.81M
GFKRF
Price
$0.04
Change
+$0.03 (+300.00%)
Updated
Jul 29 closing price
Capitalization
10.2M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FTBYF vs GFKRF

Header iconFTBYF vs GFKRF Comparison
Open Charts FTBYF vs GFKRFBanner chart's image
Fortune Bay
Price$0.55
Change-$0.06 (-9.84%)
Volume$17.46K
Capitalization33.81M
Opus One Gold
Price$0.04
Change+$0.03 (+300.00%)
Volume$250
Capitalization10.2M
FTBYF vs GFKRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FTBYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GFKRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FTBYF vs. GFKRF commentary
Sep 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTBYF is a Hold and GFKRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 03, 2025
Stock price -- (FTBYF: $0.55 vs. GFKRF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: FTBYF and GFKRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FTBYF: 53% vs. GFKRF: 3%
Market capitalization -- FTBYF: $33.81M vs. GFKRF: $10.2M
FTBYF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $33.81M. GFKRF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $10.2M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $91.29B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FTBYF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGFKRF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FTBYF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GFKRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FTBYF and GFKRF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FTBYF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GFKRF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FTBYF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • GFKRF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GFKRF is a better buy in the short-term than FTBYF.

Price Growth

FTBYF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -7.00% price change this week, while GFKRF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +7.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +22.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3851.45%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+7.10% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTBYF($33.8M) has a higher market cap than GFKRF($10.2M). GFKRF YTD gains are higher at: 335.000 vs. FTBYF (263.322). FTBYF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.1M vs. GFKRF (-1.16M). GFKRF has more cash in the bank: 615K vs. FTBYF (203K). FTBYF (0) and GFKRF (0) have equivalent revenues.
FTBYFGFKRFFTBYF / GFKRF
Capitalization33.8M10.2M331%
EBITDA-1.1M-1.16M94%
Gain YTD263.322335.00079%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash203K615K33%
Total Debt566KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FTBYF vs GFKRF: Fundamental Ratings
FTBYF
GFKRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
897
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10083
SMR RATING
1..100
9497
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3534
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4250

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FTBYF's Valuation (39) in the null industry is in the same range as GFKRF (48). This means that FTBYF’s stock grew similarly to GFKRF’s over the last 12 months.

GFKRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as FTBYF (100). This means that GFKRF’s stock grew similarly to FTBYF’s over the last 12 months.

FTBYF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as GFKRF (97). This means that FTBYF’s stock grew similarly to GFKRF’s over the last 12 months.

GFKRF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as FTBYF (35). This means that GFKRF’s stock grew similarly to FTBYF’s over the last 12 months.

GFKRF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FTBYF (100). This means that GFKRF’s stock grew similarly to FTBYF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FTBYFGFKRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
33%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
30%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
22%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
34%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
32%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
77%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
83%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
31%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FTBYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GFKRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VERA22.610.97
+4.48%
Vera Therapeutics
GOOGL211.35-1.56
-0.73%
Alphabet
LRN161.75-1.44
-0.88%
Stride
TOI3.25-0.15
-4.41%
Oncology Institute (The)
ZYXI1.55-0.09
-5.49%
Zynex

FTBYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FTBYF and GFIOF have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FTBYF and GFIOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTBYF
1D Price
Change %
FTBYF100%
-8.69%
GFIOF - FTBYF
11%
Poorly correlated
+2.65%
GFKRF - FTBYF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GBBFF - FTBYF
5%
Poorly correlated
+20.09%
GGXXF - FTBYF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GFGSF - FTBYF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.65%
More

GFKRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GFKRF and GFGSF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GFKRF and GFGSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GFKRF
1D Price
Change %
GFKRF100%
N/A
GFGSF - GFKRF
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.65%
FTBYF - GFKRF
9%
Poorly correlated
-8.69%
GBBFF - GFKRF
5%
Poorly correlated
+20.09%
GFIOF - GFKRF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+2.65%
GGXXF - GFKRF
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More