FTBYF
Price
$0.55
Change
-$0.06 (-9.84%)
Updated
Sep 2 closing price
Capitalization
33.81M
GFIOF
Price
$32.20
Change
+$1.16 (+3.74%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
30.06B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FTBYF vs GFIOF

Header iconFTBYF vs GFIOF Comparison
Open Charts FTBYF vs GFIOFBanner chart's image
Fortune Bay
Price$0.55
Change-$0.06 (-9.84%)
Volume$17.46K
Capitalization33.81M
Gold Fields
Price$32.20
Change+$1.16 (+3.74%)
Volume$1.77K
Capitalization30.06B
FTBYF vs GFIOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FTBYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GFIOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FTBYF vs. GFIOF commentary
Sep 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTBYF is a Hold and GFIOF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 03, 2025
Stock price -- (FTBYF: $0.55 vs. GFIOF: $33.06)
Brand notoriety: FTBYF and GFIOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FTBYF: 53% vs. GFIOF: 41%
Market capitalization -- FTBYF: $33.81M vs. GFIOF: $30.06B
FTBYF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $33.81M. GFIOF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $30.06B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $91.29B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FTBYF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGFIOF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FTBYF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GFIOF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GFIOF is a better buy in the long-term than FTBYF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FTBYF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GFIOF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FTBYF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • GFIOF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GFIOF is a better buy in the short-term than FTBYF.

Price Growth

FTBYF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -7.00% price change this week, while GFIOF (@Precious Metals) price change was +6.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +7.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +22.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3851.45%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+7.10% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFIOF($30.1B) has a higher market cap than FTBYF($33.8M). FTBYF YTD gains are higher at: 263.322 vs. GFIOF (145.922).
FTBYFGFIOFFTBYF / GFIOF
Capitalization33.8M30.1B0%
EBITDA-1.1MN/A-
Gain YTD263.322145.922180%
P/E RatioN/A15.82-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash203KN/A-
Total Debt566KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FTBYF vs GFIOF: Fundamental Ratings
FTBYF
GFIOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8949
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10016
SMR RATING
1..100
9442
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3536
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10078
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4250

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GFIOF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is in the same range as FTBYF (39). This means that GFIOF’s stock grew similarly to FTBYF’s over the last 12 months.

GFIOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FTBYF (100). This means that GFIOF’s stock grew significantly faster than FTBYF’s over the last 12 months.

GFIOF's SMR Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FTBYF (94). This means that GFIOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FTBYF’s over the last 12 months.

FTBYF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as GFIOF (36). This means that FTBYF’s stock grew similarly to GFIOF’s over the last 12 months.

GFIOF's P/E Growth Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as FTBYF (100). This means that GFIOF’s stock grew similarly to FTBYF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FTBYFGFIOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
77%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
83%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FTBYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GFIOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ARBTF0.05N/A
N/A
Argo Gold Inc
SOOBF42.10N/A
N/A
Sapporo Holdings, Ltd.
AIHLF3.50N/A
N/A
Adcock Ingram Holdings Ltd.
BLOZF0.42-0.01
-1.30%
Cannabix Technologies Inc.
NRILY38.29-0.82
-2.10%
Nomura Research Institute Ltd.

FTBYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FTBYF and GFIOF have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FTBYF and GFIOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTBYF
1D Price
Change %
FTBYF100%
-8.69%
GFIOF - FTBYF
11%
Poorly correlated
+2.65%
GFKRF - FTBYF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GBBFF - FTBYF
5%
Poorly correlated
+20.09%
GGXXF - FTBYF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GFGSF - FTBYF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.65%
More

GFIOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GFIOF and SSRM have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GFIOF and SSRM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GFIOF
1D Price
Change %
GFIOF100%
+2.65%
SSRM - GFIOF
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.31%
GGAZF - GFIOF
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.61%
SXNTF - GFIOF
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.59%
FTBYF - GFIOF
11%
Poorly correlated
-8.69%
GFGSF - GFIOF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.65%
More