FTBYF
Price
$0.64
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
38.68M
GFIOF
Price
$40.85
Change
+$0.36 (+0.89%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
37.61B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FTBYF vs GFIOF

Header iconFTBYF vs GFIOF Comparison
Open Charts FTBYF vs GFIOFBanner chart's image
Fortune Bay
Price$0.64
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$18.68K
Capitalization38.68M
Gold Fields
Price$40.85
Change+$0.36 (+0.89%)
Volume$210
Capitalization37.61B
FTBYF vs GFIOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FTBYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GFIOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FTBYF vs. GFIOF commentary
Sep 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTBYF is a StrongBuy and GFIOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 25, 2025
Stock price -- (FTBYF: $0.64 vs. GFIOF: $40.85)
Brand notoriety: FTBYF and GFIOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FTBYF: 49% vs. GFIOF: 48%
Market capitalization -- FTBYF: $38.68M vs. GFIOF: $37.61B
FTBYF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $38.68M. GFIOF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $37.61B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $97.88B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FTBYF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGFIOF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FTBYF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GFIOF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, GFIOF is a better buy in the long-term than FTBYF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FTBYF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GFIOF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FTBYF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GFIOF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FTBYF is a better buy in the short-term than GFIOF.

Price Growth

FTBYF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +16.17% price change this week, while GFIOF (@Precious Metals) price change was +3.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +29.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6005.04%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.48% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFIOF($37.6B) has a higher market cap than FTBYF($38.7M). FTBYF YTD gains are higher at: 320.223 vs. GFIOF (203.869). GFIOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.05B vs. FTBYF (-1.09M). GFIOF has more cash in the bank: 1.07B vs. FTBYF (1.89M). FTBYF has less debt than GFIOF: FTBYF (566K) vs GFIOF (2.55B). GFIOF has higher revenues than FTBYF: GFIOF (6.56B) vs FTBYF (0).
FTBYFGFIOFFTBYF / GFIOF
Capitalization38.7M37.6B0%
EBITDA-1.09M3.05B-0%
Gain YTD320.223203.869157%
P/E RatioN/A19.55-
Revenue06.56B-
Total Cash1.89M1.07B0%
Total Debt566K2.55B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FTBYF vs GFIOF: Fundamental Ratings
FTBYF
GFIOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6950
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1008
SMR RATING
1..100
9533
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3636
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10049
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GFIOF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is in the same range as FTBYF (39). This means that GFIOF’s stock grew similarly to FTBYF’s over the last 12 months.

GFIOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FTBYF (100). This means that GFIOF’s stock grew significantly faster than FTBYF’s over the last 12 months.

GFIOF's SMR Rating (33) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FTBYF (95). This means that GFIOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FTBYF’s over the last 12 months.

GFIOF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as FTBYF (36). This means that GFIOF’s stock grew similarly to FTBYF’s over the last 12 months.

GFIOF's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FTBYF (100). This means that GFIOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FTBYF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FTBYFGFIOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
83%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FTBYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GFIOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UTSI2.480.07
+2.90%
UTStarcom Holdings Corp
TAK14.96-0.10
-0.66%
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited
ST30.44-0.26
-0.85%
Sensata Technologies Holding plc
USAU15.12-0.85
-5.32%
US Gold Corp
LVWR4.60-0.28
-5.74%
LiveWire Group

FTBYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FTBYF and GFIOF have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FTBYF and GFIOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTBYF
1D Price
Change %
FTBYF100%
-0.05%
GFIOF - FTBYF
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.89%
GFKRF - FTBYF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GBBFF - FTBYF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.38%
GGXXF - FTBYF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GFGSF - FTBYF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.01%
More

GFIOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GFIOF and SSRM have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GFIOF and SSRM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GFIOF
1D Price
Change %
GFIOF100%
+0.89%
SSRM - GFIOF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.21%
GGAZF - GFIOF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.93%
SXNTF - GFIOF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FTBYF - GFIOF
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.05%
GFGSF - GFIOF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.01%
More