Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTAWX vs RBBCX
FTAWX vs RBBCX Comparison
Open Charts FTAWX vs RBBCX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 20% A
Price$14.26
Change+$0.02 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.56B
Columbia Income Builder C
Price$12.28
Change-$0.02 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets850.6M
FTAWX vs RBBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTAWX vs. RBBCX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTAWX is a Buy and RBBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTAWX has more cash in the bank: 5.56B vs. RBBCX (851M). RBBCX (2.99) and FTAWX (2.91) have matching dividends . FTAWX was incepted earlier than RBBCX: FTAWX (19 years) vs RBBCX (20 years). RBBCX (1.72) is less costly to investors than FTAWX (0.77). FTAWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. RBBCX (18.00). FTAWX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBBCX: FTAWX (0) vs RBBCX (2000). RBBCX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FTAWX: RBBCX (1000) vs FTAWX (500). RBBCX (5.58) and FTAWX (5.33) have marching annual gain over last year. RBBCX (14.82) and FTAWX (14.16) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FTAWX | RBBCX | FTAWX / RBBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.72 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.72 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.122 | 8.307 | 86% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 5.56B | 851M | 653% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.91 | 2.99 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.33 | 5.58 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.04 | 27.49 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.16 | 14.82 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.87 | 44.80 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement