Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTAWX vs MXIPX
FTAWX vs MXIPX Comparison
Open Charts FTAWX vs MXIPX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 20% A
Price$13.96
Change-$0.02 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.49B
Empower Conservative Profile L
Price$9.56
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.44B
FTAWX vs MXIPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTAWX vs. MXIPX commentary
Aug 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTAWX is a Buy and MXIPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTAWX has more cash in the bank: 5.49B vs. MXIPX (1.44B). FTAWX pays higher dividends than MXIPX: FTAWX (2.96) vs MXIPX (2.02). FTAWX was incepted earlier than MXIPX: FTAWX (19 years) vs MXIPX (14 years). MXIPX (1.10) is less costly to investors than FTAWX (0.77). MXIPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. FTAWX (24.00). FTAWX (0) and MXIPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTAWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.87 vs. MXIPX (3.53). FTAWX return over 5 years is better than : 11.38 vs. MXIPX (10.08).
| FTAWX | MXIPX | FTAWX / MXIPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.02 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.10 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.711 | 4.026 | 117% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.49B | 1.44B | 382% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.96 | 2.02 | 147% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.87 | 3.53 | 166% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.54 | 8.89 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.38 | 10.08 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.24 | 17.46 | 145% |