Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTANX vs HBLIX
FTANX vs HBLIX Comparison
Open Charts FTANX vs HBLIX
Fidelity Asset Manager 30%
Price$12.93
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
Hartford Balanced Income I
Price$14.76
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.68B
FTANX vs HBLIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTANX vs. HBLIX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTANX is a StrongBuy and HBLIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLIX has more cash in the bank: 11.7B vs. FTANX (2.07B). HBLIX pays higher dividends than FTANX: HBLIX (3.45) vs FTANX (2.88). FTANX was incepted earlier than HBLIX: FTANX (18 years) vs HBLIX (16 years). HBLIX (0.65) is less costly to investors than FTANX (0.53). HBLIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FTANX (19.00). FTANX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLIX: FTANX (0) vs HBLIX (2000). FTANX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.74 vs. HBLIX (6.62). FTANX return over 5 years is better than : 17.33 vs. HBLIX (11.14).
| FTANX | HBLIX | FTANX / HBLIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.65 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 0.65 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.448 | 6.953 | 165% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.07B | 11.7B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.88 | 3.45 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.74 | 6.62 | 162% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.91 | 18.52 | 145% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.33 | 11.14 | 156% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.87 | 48.12 | 112% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement