Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTAG vs LIT
FTAG vs LIT Comparison
Open Charts FTAG vs LIT
First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF
Price$26.02
Change-$0.08 (-0.31%)
Volume$526
Net Assets6.24M
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$63.08
Change+$0.27 (+0.43%)
Volume$715
Net Assets1.4B
FTAG vs LIT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTAG vs. LIT commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTAG is a Buy and LIT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LIT has more net assets: 1.4B vs. FTAG (6.24M). LIT has a higher annual dividend yield than FTAG: LIT (54.420) vs FTAG (13.678). FTAG was incepted earlier than LIT: FTAG (16 years) vs LIT (15 years). FTAG (0.70) has a lower expense ratio than LIT (0.75). LIT has a higher turnover FTAG (11.00) vs FTAG (11.00).
| FTAG | LIT | FTAG / LIT | |
| Gain YTD | 13.678 | 54.420 | 25% |
| Net Assets | 6.24M | 1.4B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.75 | 93% |
| Turnover | 11.00 | 22.87 | 48% |
| Yield | 2.42 | 0.42 | 571% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FTAG | LIT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 76% | 6 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 78% | 6 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 76% | 6 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 77% | 6 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 74% | 6 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 77% | 6 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 82% | 13 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 79% | 6 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FTAG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTAG has been loosely correlated with CTVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FTAG jumps, then CTVA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTAG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTAG | 100% | +0.06% | ||
| CTVA - FTAG | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.40% | ||
| ASIX - FTAG | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.46% | ||
| LXU - FTAG | 52% Loosely correlated | +3.21% | ||
| NTR - FTAG | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.46% | ||
| CMP - FTAG | 48% Loosely correlated | -1.94% | ||
More | ||||
LIT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIT has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LIT jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LIT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIT | 100% | -0.43% | ||
| SQM - LIT | 73% Closely correlated | +0.66% | ||
| ALB - LIT | 72% Closely correlated | -0.16% | ||
| LAR - LIT | 60% Loosely correlated | -2.55% | ||
| SGML - LIT | 59% Loosely correlated | -8.72% | ||
| RIVN - LIT | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.32% | ||
More | ||||