Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTAG vs GNR
FTAG vs GNR Comparison
Open Charts FTAG vs GNR
First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF
Price$26.52
Change+$0.09 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.37M
SPDR® S&P Global Natural Resources ETF
Price$57.80
Change+$0.22 (+0.38%)
Volume$1.49K
Net Assets3.27B
FTAG vs GNR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTAG vs. GNR commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTAG is a Hold and GNR is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GNR has more net assets: 3.27B vs. FTAG (6.37M). GNR has a higher annual dividend yield than FTAG: GNR (17.387) vs FTAG (14.701). FTAG was incepted earlier than GNR: FTAG (16 years) vs GNR (15 years). GNR (0.40) has a lower expense ratio than FTAG (0.70). GNR has a higher turnover FTAG (11.00) vs FTAG (11.00).
| FTAG | GNR | FTAG / GNR | |
| Gain YTD | 14.701 | 17.387 | 85% |
| Net Assets | 6.37M | 3.27B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.40 | 175% |
| Turnover | 11.00 | 15.00 | 73% |
| Yield | 2.25 | 3.66 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FTAG | GNR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 77% | 8 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FTAG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTAG has been closely correlated with DE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTAG jumps, then DE could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTAG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTAG | 100% | +0.74% | ||
| DE - FTAG | 66% Closely correlated | +1.15% | ||
| CNH - FTAG | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.25% | ||
| AGCO - FTAG | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.62% | ||
| CTVA - FTAG | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.36% | ||
| SQM - FTAG | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.33% | ||
More | ||||
GNR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GNR has been closely correlated with SHEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GNR jumps, then SHEL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GNR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GNR | 100% | -0.10% | ||
| SHEL - GNR | 77% Closely correlated | -0.59% | ||
| RIO - GNR | 76% Closely correlated | -0.03% | ||
| SLB - GNR | 74% Closely correlated | +2.89% | ||
| CNQ - GNR | 73% Closely correlated | +0.42% | ||
| VALE - GNR | 72% Closely correlated | +0.49% | ||
More | ||||