Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTAAX vs HBLRX
FTAAX vs HBLRX Comparison
Open Charts FTAAX vs HBLRX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% A
Price$12.94
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
Hartford Balanced Income R3
Price$14.83
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.68B
FTAAX vs HBLRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTAAX vs. HBLRX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTAAX is a StrongBuy and HBLRX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLRX has more cash in the bank: 11.7B vs. FTAAX (2.07B). HBLRX pays higher dividends than FTAAX: HBLRX (2.85) vs FTAAX (2.60). FTAAX was incepted earlier than HBLRX: FTAAX (18 years) vs HBLRX (16 years). HBLRX (1.28) is less costly to investors than FTAAX (0.80). HBLRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FTAAX (19.00). FTAAX (0) and HBLRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTAAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.45 vs. HBLRX (5.98). FTAAX return over 5 years is better than : 15.68 vs. HBLRX (7.97).
| FTAAX | HBLRX | FTAAX / HBLRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.28 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.28 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.201 | 6.346 | 176% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.07B | 11.7B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.60 | 2.85 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.45 | 5.98 | 175% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.92 | 16.48 | 157% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.68 | 7.97 | 197% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.40 | 40.60 | 122% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement