| FT | GLO | FT / GLO | |
| Gain YTD | 17.221 | 22.659 | 76% |
| Net Assets | 217M | 278M | 78% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 3.01 | - |
| Turnover | 21.79 | 85.00 | 26% |
| Yield | 3.81 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 37 years | 20 years | - |
| FT | GLO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 88% | 7 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 67% | 7 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 88% | 7 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 86% | 7 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 87% | 7 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 87% | 7 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 69% | 17 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 89% | 7 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 74% | 7 days ago 88% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FT has been loosely correlated with DTE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FT jumps, then DTE could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that GLO and LRCX have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GLO and LRCX's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GLO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLO | 100% | -0.35% | ||
| LRCX - GLO | 11% Poorly correlated | +2.21% | ||
| AIR - GLO | 10% Poorly correlated | +1.59% | ||
| DKNG - GLO | 6% Poorly correlated | -0.77% | ||
| FERG - GLO | 5% Poorly correlated | +0.31% | ||
| BA - GLO | 3% Poorly correlated | +10.16% | ||
More | ||||