FSXLF
Price
$0.35
Change
+$0.01 (+2.94%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
TBXXF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

FSXLF vs TBXXF

Header iconFSXLF vs TBXXF Comparison
Open Charts FSXLF vs TBXXFBanner chart's image
GREAT PACIFIC GOLD
Price$0.35
Change+$0.01 (+2.94%)
Volume$54.32K
CapitalizationN/A
TURMALINA METALS
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$21.02K
CapitalizationN/A
FSXLF vs TBXXF Comparison Chart
Loading...
FSXLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSXLF vs. TBXXF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSXLF is a Hold and TBXXF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (FSXLF: $0.35 vs. TBXXF: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: FSXLF and TBXXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSXLF: 97% vs. TBXXF: 85%
Market capitalization -- FSXLF: $24.2M vs. TBXXF: $13.83M
FSXLF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $24.2M. TBXXF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $13.83M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSXLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTBXXF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FSXLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TBXXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FSXLF and TBXXF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSXLF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FSXLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

FSXLF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +3.09% price change this week, while TBXXF (@Precious Metals) price change was +39.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -3.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.54%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-3.68% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSXLF($24.2M) has a higher market cap than TBXXF($13.8M). FSXLF YTD gains are higher at: -49.878 vs. TBXXF (-70.830). TBXXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -4.46M vs. FSXLF (-5.06M). FSXLF has more cash in the bank: 14.8M vs. TBXXF (3.2M). FSXLF (0) and TBXXF (0) have equivalent revenues.
FSXLFTBXXFFSXLF / TBXXF
Capitalization24.2M13.8M175%
EBITDA-5.06M-4.46M113%
Gain YTD-49.878-70.83070%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash14.8M3.2M462%
Total Debt0N/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSXLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FSXLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME31.261.82
+6.18%
GameStop Corp
TSLA479.8616.84
+3.64%
Tesla
AAPL253.482.44
+0.97%
Apple
BTC.X106140.600000110.890625
+0.10%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY604.29-2.50
-0.41%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust

FSXLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FSXLF and VITFF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FSXLF and VITFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSXLF
1D Price
Change %
FSXLF100%
+1.64%
VITFF - FSXLF
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BYAGF - FSXLF
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.30%
KNTNF - FSXLF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.55%
BRWXF - FSXLF
24%
Poorly correlated
-3.81%
SVRSF - FSXLF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.44%
More

TBXXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TBXXF and TAJIF have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TBXXF and TAJIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TBXXF
1D Price
Change %
TBXXF100%
N/A
TAJIF - TBXXF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSXLF - TBXXF
11%
Poorly correlated
+1.64%
EOGSF - TBXXF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OMGGF - TBXXF
9%
Poorly correlated
+3.71%
TETOF - TBXXF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.98%
More