Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSWFX vs HGXRX
FSWFX vs HGXRX Comparison
Open Charts FSWFX vs HGXRX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529-F-2
Price$76.88
Change+$0.54 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.31B
Hartford Global Impact R3
Price$16.51
Change+$0.06 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets321.4M
FSWFX vs HGXRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSWFX has more cash in the bank: 82.3B vs. HGXRX (321M). FSWFX pays higher dividends than HGXRX: FSWFX (0.80) vs HGXRX (0.42). FSWFX was incepted earlier than HGXRX: FSWFX (5 years) vs HGXRX (9 years). HGXRX (1.46) is less costly to investors than FSWFX (0.76). HGXRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. FSWFX (32.00). HGXRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSWFX: HGXRX (0) vs FSWFX (250). FSWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.88 vs. HGXRX (3.72). HGXRX return over 5 years is better than : 15.95 vs. FSWFX (3.85).
| FSWFX | HGXRX | FSWFX / HGXRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.41 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.46 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.259 | 8.498 | 156% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 82.3B | 321M | 25,639% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 0.42 | 192% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.88 | 3.72 | 185% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.43 | 25.76 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.85 | 15.95 | 24% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement