Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSWFX vs HGXIX
FSWFX vs HGXIX Comparison
Open Charts FSWFX vs HGXIX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529-F-2
Price$76.88
Change+$0.54 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.31B
Hartford Global Impact I
Price$16.81
Change+$0.05 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets321.4M
FSWFX vs HGXIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSWFX has more cash in the bank: 82.3B vs. HGXIX (321M). HGXIX pays higher dividends than FSWFX: HGXIX (0.89) vs FSWFX (0.80). FSWFX was incepted earlier than HGXIX: FSWFX (5 years) vs HGXIX (9 years). HGXIX (0.87) is less costly to investors than FSWFX (0.76). HGXIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. FSWFX (32.00). FSWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXIX: FSWFX (250) vs HGXIX (2000). FSWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.90 vs. HGXIX (4.32). HGXIX return over 5 years is better than : 17.84 vs. FSWFX (3.39).
| FSWFX | HGXIX | FSWFX / HGXIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.87 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.87 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.747 | 9.298 | 148% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 82.3B | 321M | 25,639% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 0.89 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.90 | 4.32 | 160% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.99 | 28.03 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.39 | 17.84 | 19% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers