Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSWFX vs HGXCX
FSWFX vs HGXCX Comparison
Open Charts FSWFX vs HGXCX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529-F-2
Price$74.97
Change+$0.28 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.75B
Hartford Global Impact C
Price$16.63
Change+$0.11 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets323.88M
FSWFX vs HGXCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSWFX has more cash in the bank: 80.8B vs. HGXCX (324M). FSWFX pays higher dividends than HGXCX: FSWFX (0.82) vs HGXCX (0.00). FSWFX was incepted earlier than HGXCX: FSWFX (5 years) vs HGXCX (9 years). HGXCX (1.99) is less costly to investors than FSWFX (0.76). HGXCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. FSWFX (32.00). FSWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXCX: FSWFX (250) vs HGXCX (2000). FSWFX (6.06) and HGXCX (5.79) have marching annual gain over last year.
| FSWFX | HGXCX | FSWFX / HGXCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.94 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.99 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.921 | 11.237 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 80.8B | 324M | 24,938% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.06 | 5.79 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.65 | 44.11 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 35.64 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement