FSV
Price
$176.53
Change
-$2.26 (-1.26%)
Updated
Jul 7, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.45B
17 days until earnings call
NTPIF
Price
$4.00
Change
-$0.10 (-2.44%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
291.87M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSV vs NTPIF

Header iconFSV vs NTPIF Comparison
Open Charts FSV vs NTPIFBanner chart's image
FirstService
Price$176.53
Change-$2.26 (-1.26%)
Volume$520
Capitalization7.45B
Nam Tai Property
Price$4.00
Change-$0.10 (-2.44%)
Volume$39.6K
Capitalization291.87M
FSV vs NTPIF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FSV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NTPIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSV vs. NTPIF commentary
Jul 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSV is a Buy and NTPIF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 08, 2025
Stock price -- (FSV: $178.79 vs. NTPIF: $4.00)
Brand notoriety: FSV and NTPIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSV: 37% vs. NTPIF: 708%
Market capitalization -- FSV: $7.45B vs. NTPIF: $291.87M
FSV [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $7.45B. NTPIF’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $291.87M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSV’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNTPIF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FSV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NTPIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NTPIF is a better buy in the long-term than FSV.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSV’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NTPIF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSV’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NTPIF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSV is a better buy in the short-term than NTPIF.

Price Growth

FSV (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +3.82% price change this week, while NTPIF (@Real Estate Development) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +31.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +35.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.93%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSV is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+31.49% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSV($7.45B) has a higher market cap than NTPIF($292M). FSV has higher P/E ratio than NTPIF: FSV (73.74) vs NTPIF (4.23). FSV YTD gains are higher at: -0.911 vs. NTPIF (-15.789).
FSVNTPIFFSV / NTPIF
Capitalization7.45B292M2,550%
EBITDA379MN/A-
Gain YTD-0.911-15.7896%
P/E Ratio73.744.231,742%
Revenue4.34BN/A-
Total Cash188MN/A-
Total Debt1.42BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSV vs NTPIF: Fundamental Ratings
FSV
NTPIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
44100
SMR RATING
1..100
6346
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5282
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8013
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NTPIF's Valuation (74) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is in the same range as FSV (76) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that NTPIF’s stock grew similarly to FSV’s over the last 12 months.

FSV's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NTPIF (100) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that FSV’s stock grew somewhat faster than NTPIF’s over the last 12 months.

NTPIF's SMR Rating (46) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is in the same range as FSV (63) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that NTPIF’s stock grew similarly to FSV’s over the last 12 months.

FSV's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as NTPIF (82) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that FSV’s stock grew similarly to NTPIF’s over the last 12 months.

NTPIF's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is significantly better than the same rating for FSV (80) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that NTPIF’s stock grew significantly faster than FSV’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSVNTPIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
60%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
50%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FSV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NTPIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LGLFX53.270.69
+1.31%
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders F
JSGCX26.230.26
+1.00%
JHancock U.S. Growth C
BGRWX29.130.26
+0.90%
Barrett Growth Retail
PXSAX17.170.14
+0.82%
Impax Small Cap A
HOORX29.020.20
+0.69%
Hartford Schroders US Small Cap Opps R3

FSV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSV has been closely correlated with CIGI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSV jumps, then CIGI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSV
1D Price
Change %
FSV100%
+1.50%
CIGI - FSV
67%
Closely correlated
+2.28%
CBRE - FSV
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.47%
JLL - FSV
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.63%
NMRK - FSV
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.16%
CWK - FSV
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.72%
More

NTPIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NTPIF and UCASU have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NTPIF and UCASU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NTPIF
1D Price
Change %
NTPIF100%
-2.44%
UCASU - NTPIF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RMR - NTPIF
11%
Poorly correlated
+1.74%
KW - NTPIF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.55%
FSV - NTPIF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.50%
CIGI - NTPIF
3%
Poorly correlated
+2.28%
More