FSV
Price
$195.75
Change
-$1.79 (-0.91%)
Updated
Aug 11 closing price
Capitalization
8.94B
72 days until earnings call
MMI
Price
$29.17
Change
+$0.10 (+0.34%)
Updated
Aug 11 closing price
Capitalization
1.14B
80 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSV vs MMI

Header iconFSV vs MMI Comparison
Open Charts FSV vs MMIBanner chart's image
FirstService
Price$195.75
Change-$1.79 (-0.91%)
Volume$79.6K
Capitalization8.94B
Marcus & Millichap
Price$29.17
Change+$0.10 (+0.34%)
Volume$161.39K
Capitalization1.14B
FSV vs MMI Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FSV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MMI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSV vs. MMI commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSV is a Buy and MMI is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (FSV: $195.75 vs. MMI: $29.17)
Brand notoriety: FSV and MMI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSV: 53% vs. MMI: 115%
Market capitalization -- FSV: $8.94B vs. MMI: $1.14B
FSV [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $8.94B. MMI’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $1.14B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $4.23B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSV’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMMI’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FSV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MMI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSV is a better buy in the long-term than MMI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSV’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MMI’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSV’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MMI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSV is a better buy in the short-term than MMI.

Price Growth

FSV (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -0.53% price change this week, while MMI (@Real Estate Development) price change was -6.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +1.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSV is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

MMI is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+1.39% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSV($8.94B) has a higher market cap than MMI($1.14B). FSV YTD gains are higher at: 8.489 vs. MMI (-23.209). FSV has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 533M vs. MMI (4.6M). MMI has more cash in the bank: 265M vs. FSV (202M). MMI has less debt than FSV: MMI (83.9M) vs FSV (1.55B). FSV has higher revenues than MMI: FSV (5.43B) vs MMI (712M).
FSVMMIFSV / MMI
Capitalization8.94B1.14B786%
EBITDA533M4.6M11,582%
Gain YTD8.489-23.209-37%
P/E Ratio62.73N/A-
Revenue5.43B712M762%
Total Cash202M265M76%
Total Debt1.55B83.9M1,846%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSV vs MMI: Fundamental Ratings
FSV
MMI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8416
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4189
SMR RATING
1..100
6291
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4479
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
871
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MMI's Valuation (29) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FSV (88). This means that MMI’s stock grew somewhat faster than FSV’s over the last 12 months.

FSV's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MMI (89). This means that FSV’s stock grew somewhat faster than MMI’s over the last 12 months.

FSV's SMR Rating (62) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as MMI (91). This means that FSV’s stock grew similarly to MMI’s over the last 12 months.

FSV's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MMI (79). This means that FSV’s stock grew somewhat faster than MMI’s over the last 12 months.

MMI's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Real Estate Development industry is significantly better than the same rating for FSV (87). This means that MMI’s stock grew significantly faster than FSV’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSVMMI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FSV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MMI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NRGEX62.89-0.18
-0.29%
Neuberger Berman Genesis E
MNDBX15.15-0.05
-0.33%
MFS New Discovery B
KCISX14.42-0.06
-0.41%
Knights of Columbus International Eq S
IMOZX27.44-0.12
-0.44%
Voya MidCap Opportunities R6
GCEBX9.64-0.13
-1.33%
Goldman Sachs Clean Energy Income A

FSV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSV has been closely correlated with CIGI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSV jumps, then CIGI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSV
1D Price
Change %
FSV100%
-0.91%
CIGI - FSV
67%
Closely correlated
-1.52%
CBRE - FSV
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.23%
JLL - FSV
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.87%
NMRK - FSV
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
CWK - FSV
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.39%
More

MMI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MMI has been closely correlated with CWK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MMI jumps, then CWK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MMI
1D Price
Change %
MMI100%
+0.34%
CWK - MMI
70%
Closely correlated
-1.39%
CBRE - MMI
68%
Closely correlated
-1.23%
NMRK - MMI
67%
Closely correlated
-0.62%
JLL - MMI
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.87%
FRPH - MMI
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.40%
More