FSUMF
Price
$12.70
Change
+$0.55 (+4.53%)
Updated
Jan 21 closing price
Capitalization
45.07B
29 days until earnings call
YORKF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 21 closing price
Capitalization
8.53M
Ad is loading...

FSUMF vs YORKF

Header iconFSUMF vs YORKF Comparison
Open Charts FSUMF vs YORKFBanner chart's image
FORTESCUE
Price$12.70
Change+$0.55 (+4.53%)
Volume$6.6K
Capitalization45.07B
York Harbour Metals
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$500
Capitalization8.53M
FSUMF vs YORKF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSUMF vs. YORKF commentary
Jan 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSUMF is a Hold and YORKF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 23, 2025
Stock price -- (FSUMF: $12.70 vs. YORKF: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: FSUMF and YORKF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSUMF: 50% vs. YORKF: 9%
Market capitalization -- FSUMF: $45.07B vs. YORKF: $8.53M
FSUMF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $45.07B. YORKF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $8.53M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSUMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileYORKF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FSUMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • YORKF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSUMF is a better buy in the long-term than YORKF.

Price Growth

FSUMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +10.43% price change this week, while YORKF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -27.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.15%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSUMF is expected to report earnings on May 14, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.44% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSUMF($45.1B) has a higher market cap than YORKF($8.53M). FSUMF YTD gains are higher at: 10.435 vs. YORKF (-23.881). FSUMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.99B vs. YORKF (-4.18M). FSUMF has more cash in the bank: 5.22B vs. YORKF (1.86M). YORKF has less debt than FSUMF: YORKF (4.29K) vs FSUMF (6.1B). FSUMF has higher revenues than YORKF: FSUMF (17B) vs YORKF (0).
FSUMFYORKFFSUMF / YORKF
Capitalization45.1B8.53M528,722%
EBITDA9.99B-4.18M-238,680%
Gain YTD10.435-23.881-44%
P/E Ratio7.66N/A-
Revenue17B0-
Total Cash5.22B1.86M280,408%
Total Debt6.1B4.29K142,427,071%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSUMF: Fundamental Ratings
FSUMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
34
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
54
SMR RATING
1..100
60
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
59
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
81
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X106146.2660004129.601600
+4.05%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY603.055.47
+0.92%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME27.47-0.04
-0.15%
GameStop Corp
TSLA424.07-2.43
-0.57%
Tesla
AAPL222.64-7.34
-3.19%
Apple

FSUMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSUMF has been loosely correlated with MALRY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSUMF jumps, then MALRY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSUMF
1D Price
Change %
FSUMF100%
+4.53%
MALRY - FSUMF
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.39%
FSUGY - FSUMF
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.58%
LUNMF - FSUMF
31%
Poorly correlated
+3.78%
LYSCF - FSUMF
29%
Poorly correlated
-3.46%
TMASF - FSUMF
28%
Poorly correlated
+2.27%
More

YORKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that YORKF and SRHYY have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that YORKF and SRHYY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To YORKF
1D Price
Change %
YORKF100%
N/A
SRHYY - YORKF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.65%
TMASF - YORKF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.27%
FSUMF - YORKF
21%
Poorly correlated
+4.53%
EMGDF - YORKF
20%
Poorly correlated
+4.39%
KNGRF - YORKF
15%
Poorly correlated
+16.90%
More