FSUMF
Price
$13.10
Change
-$0.05 (-0.38%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
41.13B
103 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TMASF
Price
$0.14
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
4.74M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSUMF vs TMASF

Header iconFSUMF vs TMASF Comparison
Open Charts FSUMF vs TMASFBanner chart's image
FORTESCUE
Price$13.10
Change-$0.05 (-0.38%)
Volume$300
Capitalization41.13B
Temas Resources
Price$0.14
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization4.74M
FSUMF vs TMASF Comparison Chart in %
FSUMF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TMASF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSUMF vs. TMASF commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSUMF is a Hold and TMASF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (FSUMF: $13.10 vs. TMASF: $0.14)
Brand notoriety: FSUMF and TMASF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSUMF: 5% vs. TMASF: 5%
Market capitalization -- FSUMF: $41.13B vs. TMASF: $4.74M
FSUMF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $41.13B. TMASF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $4.74M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSUMF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTMASF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FSUMF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TMASF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSUMF is a better buy in the long-term than TMASF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSUMF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TMASF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSUMF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • TMASF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSUMF is a better buy in the short-term than TMASF.

Price Growth

FSUMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -2.60% price change this week, while TMASF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -6.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +1.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +165.43%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSUMF is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+1.86% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSUMF($41.1B) has a higher market cap than TMASF($4.74M). TMASF YTD gains are higher at: 166.602 vs. FSUMF (13.913). FSUMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.56B vs. TMASF (-1.58M). FSUMF has more cash in the bank: 4.33B vs. TMASF (17.8K). TMASF has less debt than FSUMF: TMASF (120K) vs FSUMF (5.44B). FSUMF has higher revenues than TMASF: FSUMF (15.4B) vs TMASF (0).
FSUMFTMASFFSUMF / TMASF
Capitalization41.1B4.74M866,540%
EBITDA7.56B-1.58M-479,674%
Gain YTD13.913166.6028%
P/E Ratio11.94N/A-
Revenue15.4B0-
Total Cash4.33B17.8K24,314,607%
Total Debt5.44B120K4,532,500%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSUMF: Fundamental Ratings
FSUMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
91
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
89
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSUMFTMASF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FSUMF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TMASF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SFD21.66-0.20
-0.91%
Smithfield Foods Inc
BHFAM11.50-0.30
-2.54%
Brighthouse Financial
AIRS5.72-0.38
-6.23%
AirSculpt Technologies
LOCL2.46-0.17
-6.46%
Local Bounti Corp
WBTN12.60-4.22
-25.09%
Webtoon Entertainment Inc.

FSUMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSUMF has been closely correlated with FSUGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSUMF jumps, then FSUGY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSUMF
1D Price
Change %
FSUMF100%
-0.38%
FSUGY - FSUMF
68%
Closely correlated
+0.04%
RIO - FSUMF
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.10%
BHP - FSUMF
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.66%
VALE - FSUMF
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.80%
TECK - FSUMF
30%
Poorly correlated
-4.23%
More