FSUMF
Price
$12.65
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
38.02B
54 days until earnings call
TMASF
Price
$0.19
Change
-$0.01 (-5.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
6.42M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSUMF vs TMASF

Header iconFSUMF vs TMASF Comparison
Open Charts FSUMF vs TMASFBanner chart's image
FORTESCUE
Price$12.65
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.8K
Capitalization38.02B
Temas Resources
Price$0.19
Change-$0.01 (-5.00%)
Volume$13.14K
Capitalization6.42M
FSUMF vs TMASF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FSUMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TMASF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSUMF vs. TMASF commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSUMF is a Hold and TMASF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (FSUMF: $12.65 vs. TMASF: $0.19)
Brand notoriety: FSUMF and TMASF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSUMF: 28% vs. TMASF: 86%
Market capitalization -- FSUMF: $38.02B vs. TMASF: $6.42M
FSUMF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $38.02B. TMASF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $6.42M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSUMF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTMASF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FSUMF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TMASF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSUMF is a better buy in the long-term than TMASF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSUMF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TMASF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSUMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TMASF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FSUMF and TMASF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FSUMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -0.78% price change this week, while TMASF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +62.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +55.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSUMF is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSUMF($38B) has a higher market cap than TMASF($6.42M). TMASF YTD gains are higher at: 266.795 vs. FSUMF (10.000).
FSUMFTMASFFSUMF / TMASF
Capitalization38B6.42M592,362%
EBITDAN/A-1.56M-
Gain YTD10.000266.7954%
P/E Ratio11.53N/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total CashN/A443K-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSUMF: Fundamental Ratings
FSUMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
28
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
93
SMR RATING
1..100
40
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSUMFTMASF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FSUMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TMASF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSK40.500.89
+2.25%
GSK plc
CLPS1.060.02
+2.21%
CLPS Incorporation
REZI35.750.61
+1.74%
Resideo Technologies
CWH17.910.27
+1.53%
Camping World Holdings
SGBX0.13-0.01
-6.36%
Safe & Green Holdings Corp.

FSUMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSUMF has been loosely correlated with MALRY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSUMF jumps, then MALRY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSUMF
1D Price
Change %
FSUMF100%
N/A
MALRY - FSUMF
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.08%
FSUGY - FSUMF
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.15%
LYSCF - FSUMF
29%
Poorly correlated
-2.55%
TMASF - FSUMF
28%
Poorly correlated
-5.05%
RIO - FSUMF
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.42%
More

TMASF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TMASF and FSUMF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TMASF and FSUMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TMASF
1D Price
Change %
TMASF100%
-5.05%
FSUMF - TMASF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
YORKF - TMASF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PMMCF - TMASF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NVAAF - TMASF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SUIFF - TMASF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More