FSUMF
Price
$12.55
Change
+$0.10 (+0.80%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
38.79B
33 days until earnings call
LYSCF
Price
$11.00
Change
-$0.22 (-1.96%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
10.41B
67 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSUMF vs LYSCF

Header iconFSUMF vs LYSCF Comparison
Open Charts FSUMF vs LYSCFBanner chart's image
FORTESCUE
Price$12.55
Change+$0.10 (+0.80%)
Volume$5.5K
Capitalization38.79B
Lynas Rare Earths
Price$11.00
Change-$0.22 (-1.96%)
Volume$67.01K
Capitalization10.41B
FSUMF vs LYSCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FSUMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LYSCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSUMF vs. LYSCF commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSUMF is a Hold and LYSCF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (FSUMF: $12.55 vs. LYSCF: $11.00)
Brand notoriety: FSUMF and LYSCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSUMF: 48% vs. LYSCF: 65%
Market capitalization -- FSUMF: $38.79B vs. LYSCF: $10.41B
FSUMF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $38.79B. LYSCF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $10.41B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSUMF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLYSCF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FSUMF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LYSCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FSUMF and LYSCF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSUMF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LYSCF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSUMF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LYSCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LYSCF is a better buy in the short-term than FSUMF.

Price Growth

FSUMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LYSCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +11.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +6.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +50.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +116.62%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSUMF is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

LYSCF is expected to report earnings on Dec 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+6.26% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSUMF($38.8B) has a higher market cap than LYSCF($10.4B). LYSCF has higher P/E ratio than FSUMF: LYSCF (1964.98) vs FSUMF (11.44). LYSCF YTD gains are higher at: 174.314 vs. FSUMF (9.130). FSUMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.56B vs. LYSCF (101M). FSUMF has higher revenues than LYSCF: FSUMF (15.4B) vs LYSCF (482M).
FSUMFLYSCFFSUMF / LYSCF
Capitalization38.8B10.4B373%
EBITDA7.56B101M7,484%
Gain YTD9.130174.3145%
P/E Ratio11.441964.981%
Revenue15.4B482M3,195%
Total Cash4.33BN/A-
Total Debt5.44BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSUMF vs LYSCF: Fundamental Ratings
FSUMF
LYSCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8377
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10025
SMR RATING
1..100
9487
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4636
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
131
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSUMF's Valuation (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LYSCF (98). This means that FSUMF’s stock grew significantly faster than LYSCF’s over the last 12 months.

LYSCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FSUMF (100). This means that LYSCF’s stock grew significantly faster than FSUMF’s over the last 12 months.

LYSCF's SMR Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as FSUMF (94). This means that LYSCF’s stock grew similarly to FSUMF’s over the last 12 months.

LYSCF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as FSUMF (46). This means that LYSCF’s stock grew similarly to FSUMF’s over the last 12 months.

LYSCF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as FSUMF (13). This means that LYSCF’s stock grew similarly to FSUMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSUMFLYSCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FSUMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LYSCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CTRE34.800.36
+1.05%
CareTrust REIT
OOMA12.480.05
+0.40%
Ooma
ARCB68.46-0.61
-0.88%
ArcBest Corp
INMB2.01-0.02
-0.99%
INmune Bio
SLNHP7.25-0.24
-3.20%
Soluna Holdings

FSUMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSUMF has been loosely correlated with MALRY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSUMF jumps, then MALRY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSUMF
1D Price
Change %
FSUMF100%
+0.80%
MALRY - FSUMF
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.25%
FSUGY - FSUMF
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
LYSCF - FSUMF
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.98%
TMASF - FSUMF
28%
Poorly correlated
-3.36%
RIO - FSUMF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.96%
More

LYSCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LYSCF has been closely correlated with LYSDY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LYSCF jumps, then LYSDY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LYSCF
1D Price
Change %
LYSCF100%
-1.98%
LYSDY - LYSCF
88%
Closely correlated
-2.47%
BDNNY - LYSCF
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.01%
GLNCY - LYSCF
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.24%
PILBF - LYSCF
43%
Loosely correlated
-2.00%
GLCNF - LYSCF
39%
Loosely correlated
+2.71%
More