FSUMF
Price
$12.65
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
38.02B
54 days until earnings call
LYSCF
Price
$9.37
Change
-$0.24 (-2.50%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
9.32B
88 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSUMF vs LYSCF

Header iconFSUMF vs LYSCF Comparison
Open Charts FSUMF vs LYSCFBanner chart's image
FORTESCUE
Price$12.65
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.8K
Capitalization38.02B
Lynas Rare Earths
Price$9.37
Change-$0.24 (-2.50%)
Volume$58.17K
Capitalization9.32B
FSUMF vs LYSCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FSUMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LYSCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSUMF vs. LYSCF commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSUMF is a Hold and LYSCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (FSUMF: $12.65 vs. LYSCF: $9.37)
Brand notoriety: FSUMF and LYSCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSUMF: 28% vs. LYSCF: 46%
Market capitalization -- FSUMF: $38.02B vs. LYSCF: $9.28B
FSUMF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $38.02B. LYSCF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $9.28B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSUMF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLYSCF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FSUMF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LYSCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSUMF is a better buy in the long-term than LYSCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSUMF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LYSCF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSUMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LYSCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FSUMF and LYSCF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FSUMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -0.78% price change this week, while LYSCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +4.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +55.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSUMF is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

LYSCF is expected to report earnings on Dec 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSUMF($38B) has a higher market cap than LYSCF($9.32B). LYSCF has higher P/E ratio than FSUMF: LYSCF (1684.50) vs FSUMF (11.53). LYSCF YTD gains are higher at: 133.666 vs. FSUMF (10.000).
FSUMFLYSCFFSUMF / LYSCF
Capitalization38B9.32B408%
EBITDAN/A101M-
Gain YTD10.000133.6667%
P/E Ratio11.531684.501%
RevenueN/A482M-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSUMF vs LYSCF: Fundamental Ratings
FSUMF
LYSCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2825
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9330
SMR RATING
1..100
4087
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4636
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
101
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSUMF's Valuation (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LYSCF (98). This means that FSUMF’s stock grew significantly faster than LYSCF’s over the last 12 months.

LYSCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FSUMF (93). This means that LYSCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FSUMF’s over the last 12 months.

FSUMF's SMR Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LYSCF (87). This means that FSUMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LYSCF’s over the last 12 months.

LYSCF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as FSUMF (46). This means that LYSCF’s stock grew similarly to FSUMF’s over the last 12 months.

LYSCF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as FSUMF (10). This means that LYSCF’s stock grew similarly to FSUMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSUMFLYSCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
75%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FSUMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LYSCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GLBZ4.510.25
+5.99%
Glen Burnie Bancorp
FRD21.720.57
+2.70%
Friedman Industries Inc
IIIV30.580.44
+1.46%
i3 Verticals
FUTU187.28-1.84
-0.97%
Futu Holdings Limited
TNET70.66-0.93
-1.30%
Trinet Group

FSUMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSUMF has been loosely correlated with MALRY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSUMF jumps, then MALRY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSUMF
1D Price
Change %
FSUMF100%
N/A
MALRY - FSUMF
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.08%
FSUGY - FSUMF
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.15%
LYSCF - FSUMF
29%
Poorly correlated
-2.55%
TMASF - FSUMF
28%
Poorly correlated
-5.05%
RIO - FSUMF
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.42%
More

LYSCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LYSCF has been closely correlated with LYSDY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LYSCF jumps, then LYSDY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LYSCF
1D Price
Change %
LYSCF100%
-2.55%
LYSDY - LYSCF
88%
Closely correlated
-2.60%
BDNNY - LYSCF
48%
Loosely correlated
+2.34%
GLNCY - LYSCF
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.65%
PILBF - LYSCF
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.64%
GLCNF - LYSCF
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.79%
More