FSUGY
Price
$30.04
Change
+$0.05 (+0.17%)
Updated
Feb 4 closing price
Capitalization
46.78B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GSM
Price
$4.89
Change
-$0.15 (-2.98%)
Updated
Feb 5, 02:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
942.46M
12 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSUGY vs GSM

Header iconFSUGY vs GSM Comparison
Open Charts FSUGY vs GSMBanner chart's image
FORTESCUE
Price$30.04
Change+$0.05 (+0.17%)
Volume$34.03K
Capitalization46.78B
Ferroglobe
Price$4.89
Change-$0.15 (-2.98%)
Volume$1.02K
Capitalization942.46M
FSUGY vs GSM Comparison Chart in %
FSUGY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GSM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSUGY vs. GSM commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSUGY is a Buy and GSM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (FSUGY: $30.04 vs. GSM: $5.04)
Brand notoriety: FSUGY and GSM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSUGY: 105% vs. GSM: 122%
Market capitalization -- FSUGY: $46.78B vs. GSM: $942.46M
FSUGY [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $46.78B. GSM’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $942.46M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSUGY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGSM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FSUGY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GSM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSUGY is a better buy in the long-term than GSM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSUGY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GSM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSUGY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • GSM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSUGY is a better buy in the short-term than GSM.

Price Growth

FSUGY (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -1.41% price change this week, while GSM (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +3.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -5.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +78.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

GSM is expected to report earnings on Feb 17, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-5.52% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSUGY($46.8B) has a higher market cap than GSM($942M). FSUGY has higher P/E ratio than GSM: FSUGY (13.69) vs GSM (6.34). GSM YTD gains are higher at: 8.621 vs. FSUGY (3.195). FSUGY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.56B vs. GSM (-34.8M). GSM has less debt than FSUGY: GSM (213M) vs FSUGY (5.44B). FSUGY has higher revenues than GSM: FSUGY (15.4B) vs GSM (1.37B).
FSUGYGSMFSUGY / GSM
Capitalization46.8B942M4,968%
EBITDA7.56B-34.8M-21,719%
Gain YTD3.1958.62137%
P/E Ratio13.696.34216%
Revenue15.4B1.37B1,122%
Total Cash2.31BN/A-
Total Debt5.44B213M2,554%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSUGY vs GSM: Fundamental Ratings
FSUGY
GSM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1470
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7667
SMR RATING
1..100
9295
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4645
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
994
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8537

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSUGY's Valuation (2) in the null industry is in the same range as GSM (16) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that FSUGY’s stock grew similarly to GSM’s over the last 12 months.

GSM's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as FSUGY (76) in the null industry. This means that GSM’s stock grew similarly to FSUGY’s over the last 12 months.

FSUGY's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as GSM (95) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that FSUGY’s stock grew similarly to GSM’s over the last 12 months.

GSM's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as FSUGY (46) in the null industry. This means that GSM’s stock grew similarly to FSUGY’s over the last 12 months.

FSUGY's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GSM (94) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that FSUGY’s stock grew significantly faster than GSM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSUGYGSM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FSUGY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GSM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RWGIX4.990.05
+1.01%
Wedgewood Institutional
HLMRX18.76N/A
N/A
Harding Loevner Intl Small Coms Instl
MBGFX13.43-0.15
-1.10%
MassMutual Blue Chip Growth R4
MGNDX52.68-0.65
-1.22%
Praxis Growth Index A
URNQX59.66-1.08
-1.78%
Victory Nasdaq 100 Index R6

FSUGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSUGY has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSUGY jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSUGY
1D Price
Change %
FSUGY100%
+0.17%
BHP - FSUGY
73%
Closely correlated
-0.71%
RIO - FSUGY
72%
Closely correlated
+0.11%
FSUMF - FSUGY
68%
Closely correlated
N/A
VALE - FSUGY
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.18%
GLNCY - FSUGY
55%
Loosely correlated
-4.86%
More

GSM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSM has been loosely correlated with MJDLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GSM jumps, then MJDLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSM
1D Price
Change %
GSM100%
-0.20%
MJDLF - GSM
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.34%
FSUGY - GSM
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
BDNNY - GSM
36%
Loosely correlated
-4.03%
IVPAF - GSM
36%
Loosely correlated
-5.21%
GLNCY - GSM
36%
Loosely correlated
-4.86%
More