FSUGY
Price
$25.49
Change
-$0.74 (-2.82%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
39.38B
GMBXF
Price
$6.70
Change
-$0.17 (-2.47%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
53.44B
Earnings call today
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSUGY vs GMBXF

Header iconFSUGY vs GMBXF Comparison
Open Charts FSUGY vs GMBXFBanner chart's image
FORTESCUE
Price$25.49
Change-$0.74 (-2.82%)
Volume$29.45K
Capitalization39.38B
Grupo Mexico S.A.B. de C.V
Price$6.70
Change-$0.17 (-2.47%)
Volume$2.34K
Capitalization53.44B
FSUGY vs GMBXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FSUGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GMBXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSUGY vs. GMBXF commentary
Aug 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSUGY is a Buy and GMBXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 16, 2025
Stock price -- (FSUGY: $25.49 vs. GMBXF: $6.70)
Brand notoriety: FSUGY and GMBXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSUGY: 38% vs. GMBXF: 18%
Market capitalization -- FSUGY: $39.38B vs. GMBXF: $53.44B
FSUGY [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $39.38B. GMBXF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $53.44B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.25B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSUGY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGMBXF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FSUGY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GMBXF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GMBXF is a better buy in the long-term than FSUGY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSUGY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GMBXF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSUGY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GMBXF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSUGY is a better buy in the short-term than GMBXF.

Price Growth

FSUGY (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +6.47% price change this week, while GMBXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +1.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +1.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +40.32%.

Reported Earning Dates

GMBXF is expected to report earnings on Aug 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+1.87% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GMBXF($53.4B) has a higher market cap than FSUGY($39.4B). GMBXF has higher P/E ratio than FSUGY: GMBXF (13.40) vs FSUGY (10.08). GMBXF YTD gains are higher at: 42.857 vs. FSUGY (16.561). GMBXF has more cash in the bank: 9.02B vs. FSUGY (2.58M). FSUGY has less debt than GMBXF: FSUGY (38.3M) vs GMBXF (10.1B).
FSUGYGMBXFFSUGY / GMBXF
Capitalization39.4B53.4B74%
EBITDAN/A9B-
Gain YTD16.56142.85739%
P/E Ratio10.0813.4075%
RevenueN/A16.4B-
Total Cash2.58M9.02B0%
Total Debt38.3M10.1B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSUGY vs GMBXF: Fundamental Ratings
FSUGY
GMBXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1785
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5630
SMR RATING
1..100
4148
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4341
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1346
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSUGY's Valuation (2) in the null industry is in the same range as GMBXF (8). This means that FSUGY’s stock grew similarly to GMBXF’s over the last 12 months.

GMBXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the null industry is in the same range as FSUGY (56). This means that GMBXF’s stock grew similarly to FSUGY’s over the last 12 months.

FSUGY's SMR Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as GMBXF (48). This means that FSUGY’s stock grew similarly to GMBXF’s over the last 12 months.

GMBXF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as FSUGY (43). This means that GMBXF’s stock grew similarly to FSUGY’s over the last 12 months.

FSUGY's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GMBXF (46). This means that FSUGY’s stock grew somewhat faster than GMBXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSUGYGMBXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FSUGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GMBXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ASB25.450.10
+0.39%
Associated Banc-Corp
TEAM164.390.40
+0.24%
Atlassian Corp
COE32.27-0.48
-1.47%
51Talk Online Education Group
WTTR8.21-0.13
-1.56%
Select Water Solutions
DRIO0.44-0.01
-3.16%
DarioHealth Corp

FSUGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSUGY has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSUGY jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSUGY
1D Price
Change %
FSUGY100%
-2.82%
BHP - FSUGY
73%
Closely correlated
-1.66%
RIO - FSUGY
72%
Closely correlated
-1.65%
VALE - FSUGY
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.69%
GLNCY - FSUGY
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.13%
GLCNF - FSUGY
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
More

GMBXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GMBXF has been loosely correlated with IVPAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GMBXF jumps, then IVPAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GMBXF
1D Price
Change %
GMBXF100%
-2.47%
IVPAF - GMBXF
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.21%
GLNCY - GMBXF
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.13%
GLCNF - GMBXF
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
BDNNY - GMBXF
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.27%
FSUGY - GMBXF
36%
Loosely correlated
-2.82%
More