FSUGY
Price
$25.44
Change
+$0.62 (+2.50%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
37.89B
GLCNF
Price
$3.81
Change
-$0.01 (-0.26%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
45.46B
53 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSUGY vs GLCNF

Header iconFSUGY vs GLCNF Comparison
Open Charts FSUGY vs GLCNFBanner chart's image
FORTESCUE
Price$25.44
Change+$0.62 (+2.50%)
Volume$31.55K
Capitalization37.89B
Glencore
Price$3.81
Change-$0.01 (-0.26%)
Volume$289.66K
Capitalization45.46B
FSUGY vs GLCNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FSUGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GLCNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSUGY vs. GLCNF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSUGY is a Hold and GLCNF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FSUGY: $25.44 vs. GLCNF: $3.81)
Brand notoriety: FSUGY and GLCNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSUGY: 60% vs. GLCNF: 878%
Market capitalization -- FSUGY: $37.89B vs. GLCNF: $45.46B
FSUGY [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $37.89B. GLCNF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $45.46B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSUGY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGLCNF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FSUGY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GLCNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSUGY is a better buy in the long-term than GLCNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSUGY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GLCNF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSUGY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GLCNF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FSUGY and GLCNF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FSUGY (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +0.95% price change this week, while GLCNF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -5.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.32%.

Reported Earning Dates

GLCNF is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.77% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLCNF($45.5B) has a higher market cap than FSUGY($37.9B). GLCNF has higher P/E ratio than FSUGY: GLCNF (14.75) vs FSUGY (11.26). FSUGY YTD gains are higher at: 16.333 vs. GLCNF (-11.180). FSUGY has more cash in the bank: 2.31B vs. GLCNF (1.42B). FSUGY has less debt than GLCNF: FSUGY (5.44B) vs GLCNF (41.7B).
FSUGYGLCNFFSUGY / GLCNF
Capitalization37.9B45.5B83%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD16.333-11.180-146%
P/E Ratio11.2614.7576%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total Cash2.31B1.42B163%
Total Debt5.44B41.7B13%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSUGY vs GLCNF: Fundamental Ratings
FSUGY
GLCNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1650
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6160
SMR RATING
1..100
40100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4576
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1163
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSUGY's Valuation (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GLCNF (92). This means that FSUGY’s stock grew significantly faster than GLCNF’s over the last 12 months.

GLCNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as FSUGY (61). This means that GLCNF’s stock grew similarly to FSUGY’s over the last 12 months.

FSUGY's SMR Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLCNF (100). This means that FSUGY’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLCNF’s over the last 12 months.

FSUGY's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as GLCNF (76). This means that FSUGY’s stock grew similarly to GLCNF’s over the last 12 months.

FSUGY's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLCNF (63). This means that FSUGY’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLCNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSUGYGLCNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FSUGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GLCNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WDC90.494.59
+5.34%
Western Digital Corp
PLXS137.772.81
+2.08%
Plexus Corp
AMN20.230.39
+1.97%
AMN Healthcare Services
LFVN13.46-0.11
-0.81%
Lifevantage Corp
IBIO0.81-0.05
-5.53%
iBio

FSUGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSUGY has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSUGY jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSUGY
1D Price
Change %
FSUGY100%
+2.50%
BHP - FSUGY
73%
Closely correlated
-0.61%
RIO - FSUGY
72%
Closely correlated
-0.03%
VALE - FSUGY
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.49%
GLNCY - FSUGY
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.39%
GLCNF - FSUGY
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.13%
More

GLCNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLCNF has been closely correlated with GLNCY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GLCNF jumps, then GLNCY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLCNF
1D Price
Change %
GLCNF100%
-0.13%
GLNCY - GLCNF
89%
Closely correlated
-0.39%
BDNNY - GLCNF
67%
Closely correlated
-2.24%
RIO - GLCNF
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.03%
BHP - GLCNF
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.61%
IVPAF - GLCNF
57%
Loosely correlated
-2.44%
More