FSUGY
Price
$25.05
Change
-$0.03 (-0.12%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
38.5B
GCCFF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
3.15M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSUGY vs GCCFF

Header iconFSUGY vs GCCFF Comparison
Open Charts FSUGY vs GCCFFBanner chart's image
FORTESCUE
Price$25.05
Change-$0.03 (-0.12%)
Volume$57.29K
Capitalization38.5B
Golden Cariboo Resources
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.05K
Capitalization3.15M
FSUGY vs GCCFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FSUGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GCCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSUGY vs. GCCFF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSUGY is a Hold and GCCFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (FSUGY: $25.05 vs. GCCFF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: FSUGY and GCCFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSUGY: 110% vs. GCCFF: 2%
Market capitalization -- FSUGY: $38.5B vs. GCCFF: $3.15M
FSUGY [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $38.5B. GCCFF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $3.15M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSUGY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGCCFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FSUGY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GCCFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSUGY is a better buy in the long-term than GCCFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSUGY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GCCFF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSUGY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GCCFF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GCCFF is a better buy in the short-term than FSUGY.

Price Growth

FSUGY (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +0.08% price change this week, while GCCFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -4.84% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +6.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +50.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +116.62%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+6.26% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSUGY($38.5B) has a higher market cap than GCCFF($3.15M). FSUGY YTD gains are higher at: 22.042 vs. GCCFF (-62.777). FSUGY has more cash in the bank: 2.31B vs. GCCFF (337K).
FSUGYGCCFFFSUGY / GCCFF
Capitalization38.5B3.15M1,221,447%
EBITDAN/A-5.38M-
Gain YTD22.042-62.777-35%
P/E Ratio11.42N/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total Cash2.31B337K686,350%
Total Debt5.44BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSUGY vs GCCFF: Fundamental Ratings
FSUGY
GCCFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
60100
SMR RATING
1..100
94100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4365
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1395
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSUGY's Valuation (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GCCFF (50). This means that FSUGY’s stock grew somewhat faster than GCCFF’s over the last 12 months.

FSUGY's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GCCFF (100). This means that FSUGY’s stock grew somewhat faster than GCCFF’s over the last 12 months.

FSUGY's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as GCCFF (100). This means that FSUGY’s stock grew similarly to GCCFF’s over the last 12 months.

FSUGY's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as GCCFF (65). This means that FSUGY’s stock grew similarly to GCCFF’s over the last 12 months.

FSUGY's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GCCFF (95). This means that FSUGY’s stock grew significantly faster than GCCFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSUGYGCCFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FSUGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GCCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSHA3.250.19
+6.21%
Taysha Gene Therapies
ELMD24.190.95
+4.09%
Electromed
FNV217.533.61
+1.69%
Franco-Nevada Corp
AB37.90-0.17
-0.45%
AllianceBernstein Holding LP
NCRA1.46-0.03
-2.01%
Nocera

FSUGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSUGY has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSUGY jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSUGY
1D Price
Change %
FSUGY100%
-0.12%
BHP - FSUGY
73%
Closely correlated
-1.71%
RIO - FSUGY
72%
Closely correlated
-0.96%
VALE - FSUGY
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.74%
GLNCY - FSUGY
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.24%
GLCNF - FSUGY
51%
Loosely correlated
+2.71%
More

GCCFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GCCFF and FEOVF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GCCFF and FEOVF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GCCFF
1D Price
Change %
GCCFF100%
N/A
FEOVF - GCCFF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MUNMF - GCCFF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.62%
GARWF - GCCFF
6%
Poorly correlated
-5.76%
FSUGY - GCCFF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.12%
FTMDF - GCCFF
1%
Poorly correlated
-3.73%
More