Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSTUX vs RMEBX
FSTUX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FSTUX vs RMEBX
Invesco Dividend Income Investor
Price$28.14
Change-$0.14 (-0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.69B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.40
Change-$0.15 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.9B
FSTUX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSTUX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTUX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. FSTUX (3.69B). FSTUX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: FSTUX (1.29) vs RMEBX (1.11). FSTUX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FSTUX (39 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FSTUX (0.94). FSTUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSTUX: RMEBX (250) vs FSTUX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.63 vs. FSTUX (6.12). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 53.85 vs. FSTUX (39.33).
| FSTUX | RMEBX | FSTUX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.07 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.07 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.523 | 10.612 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.69B | 110B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 1.11 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.12 | 7.63 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.23 | 22.19 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.33 | 53.85 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.30 | 77.43 | 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers