FSTTF
Price
$0.10
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
VMSXF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
Ad is loading...

FSTTF vs VMSXF

Header iconFSTTF vs VMSXF Comparison
Open Charts FSTTF vs VMSXFBanner chart's image
First Tellurium
Price$0.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$12.6K
CapitalizationN/A
Nine Mile Metals
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$105K
CapitalizationN/A
FSTTF vs VMSXF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSTTF vs. VMSXF commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTTF is a Hold and VMSXF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (FSTTF: $0.10 vs. VMSXF: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: FSTTF and VMSXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSTTF: 24% vs. VMSXF: 272%
Market capitalization -- FSTTF: $7.49M vs. VMSXF: $4.35M
FSTTF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $7.49M. VMSXF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $4.35M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSTTF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVMSXF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FSTTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VMSXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, VMSXF is a better buy in the long-term than FSTTF.

Price Growth

FSTTF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +0.31% price change this week, while VMSXF (@Precious Metals) price change was -3.96% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -4.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-4.57% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSTTF($7.49M) has a higher market cap than VMSXF($4.35M). FSTTF YTD gains are higher at: 65.763 vs. VMSXF (-62.309). FSTTF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.74M vs. VMSXF (-2.43M). VMSXF has more cash in the bank: 1.07M vs. FSTTF (859K). VMSXF has less debt than FSTTF: VMSXF (55.9K) vs FSTTF (183K). FSTTF (0) and VMSXF (0) have equivalent revenues.
FSTTFVMSXFFSTTF / VMSXF
Capitalization7.49M4.35M172%
EBITDA-1.74M-2.43M71%
Gain YTD65.763-62.309-106%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash859K1.07M81%
Total Debt183K55.9K327%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSTTF: Fundamental Ratings
FSTTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
94
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
93
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

FSTTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FSTTF and PUCCF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FSTTF and PUCCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSTTF
1D Price
Change %
FSTTF100%
-1.21%
PUCCF - FSTTF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DYNR - FSTTF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VMSXF - FSTTF
16%
Poorly correlated
-5.33%
PUMXF - FSTTF
13%
Poorly correlated
+8.95%
SNGCF - FSTTF
13%
Poorly correlated
+6.43%
More

VMSXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VMSXF and FSTTF have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VMSXF and FSTTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VMSXF
1D Price
Change %
VMSXF100%
-5.33%
FSTTF - VMSXF
16%
Poorly correlated
-1.21%
SGNLF - VMSXF
13%
Poorly correlated
-1.08%
ARRKF - VMSXF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ATLX - VMSXF
6%
Poorly correlated
-2.13%
ACRG - VMSXF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More