FSTTF
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
7.49M
PUCCF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
5.02M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSTTF vs PUCCF

Header iconFSTTF vs PUCCF Comparison
Open Charts FSTTF vs PUCCFBanner chart's image
First Tellurium
Price$0.08
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$43.24K
Capitalization7.49M
CAROLINA RUSH
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$128.3K
Capitalization5.02M
FSTTF vs PUCCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FSTTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PUCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSTTF vs. PUCCF commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTTF is a Hold and PUCCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (FSTTF: $0.08 vs. PUCCF: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: FSTTF and PUCCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSTTF: 235% vs. PUCCF: 637%
Market capitalization -- FSTTF: $7.49M vs. PUCCF: $5.02M
FSTTF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $7.49M. PUCCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $5.02M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSTTF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePUCCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FSTTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PUCCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PUCCF is a better buy in the long-term than FSTTF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSTTF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PUCCF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSTTF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PUCCF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PUCCF is a better buy in the short-term than FSTTF.

Price Growth

FSTTF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -9.33% price change this week, while PUCCF (@Precious Metals) price change was +16.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSTTF($7.49M) has a higher market cap than PUCCF($5.02M). PUCCF YTD gains are higher at: 27.551 vs. FSTTF (-5.474). FSTTF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.74M vs. PUCCF (-2.95M). FSTTF (0) and PUCCF (0) have equivalent revenues.
FSTTFPUCCFFSTTF / PUCCF
Capitalization7.49M5.02M149%
EBITDA-1.74M-2.95M59%
Gain YTD-5.47427.551-20%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash859KN/A-
Total Debt183KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSTTF vs PUCCF: Fundamental Ratings
FSTTF
PUCCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
93100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6450
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSTTF's Valuation (70) in the null industry is in the same range as PUCCF (89). This means that FSTTF’s stock grew similarly to PUCCF’s over the last 12 months.

FSTTF's Profit vs Risk Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as PUCCF (100). This means that FSTTF’s stock grew similarly to PUCCF’s over the last 12 months.

FSTTF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PUCCF (100). This means that FSTTF’s stock grew similarly to PUCCF’s over the last 12 months.

PUCCF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as FSTTF (64). This means that PUCCF’s stock grew similarly to FSTTF’s over the last 12 months.

PUCCF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FSTTF (100). This means that PUCCF’s stock grew similarly to FSTTF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSTTFPUCCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FSTTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PUCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GHM50.570.74
+1.49%
Graham Corp
ZION51.480.08
+0.16%
Zions Bancorporation NA
LIN463.79-0.67
-0.14%
Linde plc
TWO10.62-0.08
-0.75%
Two Harbors Investment Corp
FAT2.36-0.02
-0.84%
FAT Brands

FSTTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FSTTF and PUCCF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FSTTF and PUCCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSTTF
1D Price
Change %
FSTTF100%
N/A
PUCCF - FSTTF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DYNR - FSTTF
20%
Poorly correlated
+7.14%
PUMXF - FSTTF
13%
Poorly correlated
+17.65%
SNGCF - FSTTF
13%
Poorly correlated
-0.89%
ACRG - FSTTF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PUCCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PUCCF and VITFF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PUCCF and VITFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PUCCF
1D Price
Change %
PUCCF100%
N/A
VITFF - PUCCF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BYAGF - PUCCF
25%
Poorly correlated
-4.11%
PAEKY - PUCCF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSTTF - PUCCF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELRRF - PUCCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.11%
More