Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSTRX vs RMFCX
FSTRX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts FSTRX vs RMFCX
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value A
Price$34.01
Change+$0.22 (+0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.76B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.46
Change+$0.39 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.01B
FSTRX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSTRX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTRX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. FSTRX (1.76B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than FSTRX: RMFCX (1.27) vs FSTRX (0.82). FSTRX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: FSTRX (11 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). FSTRX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). FSTRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSTRX: RMFCX (250) vs FSTRX (1500). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.47 vs. FSTRX (7.79). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 61.83 vs. FSTRX (47.84).
| FSTRX | RMFCX | FSTRX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.91 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.91 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.900 | 9.596 | 114% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.76B | 109B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 1.27 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.79 | 11.47 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.79 | 29.27 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.84 | 61.83 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.91 | 79.21 | 42% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement