Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSTRX vs RMEBX
FSTRX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FSTRX vs RMEBX
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value A
Price$34.55
Change+$0.21 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.84B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.75
Change+$0.28 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.54B
FSTRX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSTRX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTRX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. FSTRX (1.84B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than FSTRX: RMEBX (1.12) vs FSTRX (0.82). FSTRX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FSTRX (11 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). FSTRX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). FSTRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSTRX: RMEBX (250) vs FSTRX (1500). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.26 vs. FSTRX (7.87). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 59.35 vs. FSTRX (45.35).
| FSTRX | RMEBX | FSTRX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.07 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.07 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.660 | 11.253 | 113% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.84B | 111B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 1.12 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.87 | 11.26 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.73 | 30.31 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.35 | 59.35 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.88 | 80.17 | 45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement