Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSTRX vs RMEBX
FSTRX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FSTRX vs RMEBX
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value A
Price$34.68
Change+$0.17 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.92B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.71
Change+$0.28 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.46B
FSTRX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSTRX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTRX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. FSTRX (1.92B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than FSTRX: RMEBX (1.09) vs FSTRX (0.80). FSTRX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FSTRX (11 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). FSTRX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). FSTRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSTRX: RMEBX (250) vs FSTRX (1500). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.57 vs. FSTRX (4.31). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 55.29 vs. FSTRX (40.92).
| FSTRX | RMEBX | FSTRX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.07 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.07 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.084 | 11.308 | 116% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.92B | 109B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 1.09 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.31 | 7.57 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.67 | 31.59 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.92 | 55.29 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.89 | 89.40 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement