Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSTLX vs RMFCX
FSTLX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts FSTLX vs RMFCX
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value R6
Price$34.07
Change+$0.21 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.76B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.46
Change+$0.39 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.01B
FSTLX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSTLX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTLX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. FSTLX (1.76B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than FSTLX: RMFCX (1.27) vs FSTLX (1.07). FSTLX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: FSTLX (9 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FSTLX (0.85). FSTLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). FSTLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: FSTLX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.47 vs. FSTLX (8.08). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 61.83 vs. FSTLX (50.13).
| FSTLX | RMFCX | FSTLX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.91 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.91 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.034 | 9.596 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.76B | 109B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 1.27 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.08 | 11.47 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.94 | 29.27 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.13 | 61.83 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 79.21 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement