Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSTKX vs RMFCX
FSTKX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts FSTKX vs RMFCX
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value Svc
Price$34.92
Change-$0.03 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.09B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.36
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
FSTKX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSTKX vs. RMFCX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTKX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. FSTKX (2.09B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than FSTKX: RMFCX (1.18) vs FSTKX (0.80). FSTKX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: FSTKX (44 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). FSTKX (1.17) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). FSTKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSTKX: RMFCX (250) vs FSTKX (1000000). FSTKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.28 vs. RMFCX (8.05). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 46.17 vs. FSTKX (27.32).
| FSTKX | RMFCX | FSTKX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.91 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.91 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.846 | 9.696 | 143% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.09B | 112B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 1.18 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.28 | 8.05 | 152% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.82 | 28.89 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.32 | 46.17 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.31 | 91.60 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement