Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSTKX vs RMFCX
FSTKX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts FSTKX vs RMFCX
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value Svc
Price$34.08
Change+$0.22 (+0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.76B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.46
Change+$0.39 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.01B
FSTKX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSTKX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTKX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. FSTKX (1.76B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than FSTKX: RMFCX (1.27) vs FSTKX (0.82). FSTKX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: FSTKX (43 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). FSTKX (1.17) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). FSTKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSTKX: RMFCX (250) vs FSTKX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.47 vs. FSTKX (7.80). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 61.83 vs. FSTKX (47.93).
| FSTKX | RMFCX | FSTKX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.91 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.91 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 43 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.874 | 9.596 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.76B | 109B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 1.27 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.80 | 11.47 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.85 | 29.27 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.93 | 61.83 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.02 | 79.21 | 42% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement