Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSTKX vs RMFCX
FSTKX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts FSTKX vs RMFCX
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value Svc
Price$32.57
Change-$0.36 (-1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.68B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.52
Change-$0.44 (-0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.76B
FSTKX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSTKX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTKX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. FSTKX (1.68B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than FSTKX: RMFCX (1.31) vs FSTKX (0.87). FSTKX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: FSTKX (43 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). FSTKX (1.17) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). FSTKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSTKX: RMFCX (250) vs FSTKX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.70 vs. FSTKX (3.10). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 59.85 vs. FSTKX (41.76).
| FSTKX | RMFCX | FSTKX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.91 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.91 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 43 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.785 | 6.021 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.68B | 106B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.87 | 1.31 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.10 | 8.70 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.11 | 28.43 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.76 | 59.85 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.79 | 69.75 | 36% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement