Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSTKX vs RMEBX
FSTKX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FSTKX vs RMEBX
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value Svc
Price$35.67
Change+$0.09 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.02B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$62.62
Change+$0.14 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.07B
FSTKX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSTKX vs. RMEBX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTKX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. FSTKX (2.02B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than FSTKX: RMEBX (1.05) vs FSTKX (0.82). FSTKX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FSTKX (44 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). FSTKX (1.17) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). FSTKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSTKX: RMEBX (250) vs FSTKX (1000000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.55 vs. FSTKX (-2.16). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 53.80 vs. FSTKX (35.85).
| FSTKX | RMEBX | FSTKX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.07 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.07 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.997 | 14.940 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.02B | 112B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 1.05 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.16 | 6.55 | -33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.00 | 30.03 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.85 | 53.80 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.91 | 92.20 | 51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement