Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSTKX vs RMEBX
FSTKX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FSTKX vs RMEBX
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value Svc
Price$34.75
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.92B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.70
Change-$0.01 (-0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.46B
FSTKX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSTKX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTKX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. FSTKX (1.92B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than FSTKX: RMEBX (1.09) vs FSTKX (0.79). FSTKX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FSTKX (43 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). FSTKX (1.17) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). FSTKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSTKX: RMEBX (250) vs FSTKX (1000000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.57 vs. FSTKX (4.33). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 55.29 vs. FSTKX (41.02).
| FSTKX | RMEBX | FSTKX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.07 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.07 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 43 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.054 | 11.308 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.92B | 109B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 1.09 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.33 | 7.57 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.73 | 31.59 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.02 | 55.29 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.09 | 89.40 | 49% |