Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSTKX vs RMEBX
FSTKX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FSTKX vs RMEBX
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value Svc
Price$32.57
Change-$0.36 (-1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.68B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$57.84
Change-$0.46 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.76B
FSTKX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSTKX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTKX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. FSTKX (1.68B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than FSTKX: RMEBX (1.16) vs FSTKX (0.87). FSTKX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FSTKX (43 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). FSTKX (1.17) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). FSTKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSTKX: RMEBX (250) vs FSTKX (1000000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.54 vs. FSTKX (3.10). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 58.69 vs. FSTKX (41.76).
| FSTKX | RMEBX | FSTKX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.07 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.07 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 43 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.785 | 5.923 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.68B | 106B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.87 | 1.16 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.10 | 8.54 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.11 | 27.89 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.76 | 58.69 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.79 | 68.22 | 36% |