Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSTKX vs RMEBX
FSTKX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FSTKX vs RMEBX
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value Svc
Price$35.84
Change+$0.03 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.04B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$62.83
Change+$0.31 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
FSTKX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSTKX vs. RMEBX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTKX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. FSTKX (2.04B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than FSTKX: RMEBX (1.03) vs FSTKX (0.80). FSTKX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FSTKX (44 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). FSTKX (1.17) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). FSTKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSTKX: RMEBX (250) vs FSTKX (1000000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.38 vs. FSTKX (-2.67). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 51.74 vs. FSTKX (33.81).
| FSTKX | RMEBX | FSTKX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.07 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.07 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.562 | 14.812 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.04B | 112B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 1.03 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.67 | 5.38 | -50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.69 | 26.56 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.81 | 51.74 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.99 | 87.74 | 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement