Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSTBX vs RIRAX
FSTBX vs RIRAX Comparison
Open Charts FSTBX vs RIRAX
Federated Hermes Global Allocation A
Price$22.19
Change+$0.05 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets281.29M
American Funds Capital Income Bldr R1
Price$78.60
Change+$0.40 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets118.23B
FSTBX vs RIRAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSTBX vs. RIRAX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTBX is a Buy and RIRAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIRAX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. FSTBX (281M). RIRAX pays higher dividends than FSTBX: RIRAX (2.22) vs FSTBX (1.99). FSTBX was incepted earlier than RIRAX: FSTBX (57 years) vs RIRAX (23 years). FSTBX (1.44) is less costly to investors than RIRAX (1.36). FSTBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 102.00 vs. RIRAX (56.00). RIRAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSTBX: RIRAX (250) vs FSTBX (1500). FSTBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.18 vs. RIRAX (11.05). RIRAX return over 5 years is better than : 45.26 vs. FSTBX (17.28).
| FSTBX | RIRAX | FSTBX / RIRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.36 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 1.36 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 57 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.282 | 14.755 | 76% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 281M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.99 | 2.22 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.18 | 11.05 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.10 | 35.63 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.28 | 45.26 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.65 | 56.66 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers