Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSTBX vs RIRAX
FSTBX vs RIRAX Comparison
Open Charts FSTBX vs RIRAX
Federated Hermes Global Allocation A
Price$21.63
Change+$0.07 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets277.47M
American Funds Capital Income Bldr R1
Price$77.16
Change+$0.26 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets116.46B
FSTBX vs RIRAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSTBX vs. RIRAX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTBX is a Buy and RIRAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIRAX has more cash in the bank: 116B vs. FSTBX (277M). RIRAX pays higher dividends than FSTBX: RIRAX (2.27) vs FSTBX (2.04). FSTBX was incepted earlier than RIRAX: FSTBX (57 years) vs RIRAX (23 years). FSTBX (1.44) is less costly to investors than RIRAX (1.36). FSTBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 102.00 vs. RIRAX (56.00). RIRAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSTBX: RIRAX (250) vs FSTBX (1500). RIRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.87 vs. FSTBX (11.45). RIRAX return over 5 years is better than : 45.98 vs. FSTBX (19.98).
| FSTBX | RIRAX | FSTBX / RIRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.36 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 1.36 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 57 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.473 | 12.653 | 67% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 277M | 116B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.04 | 2.27 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.45 | 14.87 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.85 | 30.67 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.98 | 45.98 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.33 | 47.97 | 72% |