Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSTA vs PSL
FSTA vs PSL Comparison
Open Charts FSTA vs PSL
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples ETF
Price$51.40
Change+$0.15 (+0.29%)
Volume$88.07K
Net Assets1.35B
Invesco DW Consumer Staples Momt ETF
Price$111.91
Change-$0.21 (-0.19%)
Volume$6.7K
Net Assets98.71M
FSTA vs PSL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSTA vs. PSL commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTA is a Buy and PSL is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSTA has more net assets: 1.35B vs. PSL (98.7M). PSL has a higher annual dividend yield than FSTA: PSL (7.123) vs FSTA (5.181). FSTA was incepted earlier than PSL: FSTA (12 years) vs PSL (19 years). FSTA (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than PSL (0.60). PSL has a higher turnover FSTA (8.00) vs FSTA (8.00).
| FSTA | PSL | FSTA / PSL | |
| Gain YTD | 5.181 | 7.123 | 73% |
| Net Assets | 1.35B | 98.7M | 1,364% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 0.60 | 14% |
| Turnover | 8.00 | 104.00 | 8% |
| Yield | 2.19 | 0.72 | 304% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FSTA | PSL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 16 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 73% | 12 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FSTA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSTA has been closely correlated with PG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSTA jumps, then PG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FSTA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSTA | 100% | +0.29% | ||
| PG - FSTA | 76% Closely correlated | +0.52% | ||
| KO - FSTA | 71% Closely correlated | -0.42% | ||
| CL - FSTA | 68% Closely correlated | +1.74% | ||
| PEP - FSTA | 68% Closely correlated | +0.63% | ||
| WMT - FSTA | 67% Closely correlated | -0.42% | ||
More | ||||
PSL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PSL has been loosely correlated with IPAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PSL jumps, then IPAR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PSL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSL | 100% | -0.19% | ||
| IPAR - PSL | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.20% | ||
| TAP - PSL | 17% Poorly correlated | +1.92% | ||
| PRDO - PSL | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.12% | ||
| MNST - PSL | 10% Poorly correlated | -1.56% | ||
| WDFC - PSL | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.66% | ||
More | ||||